James G. Speight

Coal-Fired Power Generation Handbook


Скачать книгу

Pennsylvanian coals may have had some ecological tolerance to swampy conditions, yet other Pennsylvanian coal plants (e.g., the conifer Cordaites, the giant scouring rush Calamites, the various extinct seed ferns) by their basic construction may have preferred existence in well-drained soils and not in the proverbial peat swamp. The anatomy of coal-forming plants is considered by many coal geochemists to indicate that initiation of the coalification lay down occurred in a tropical or subtropical climate, a conclusion which can be used to argue against autochthonous theory, for modern swamps are most extensive and have the deepest accumulation of peat in the higher-latitude cooler climates.

      In more general terms, the coalification of coal is a consequence of thermal effects and pressure through compaction of the sediment, which depending upon the initial events – including the composition of the coal purposes, will be site specific. However, the coalification processes involved in coal formation are marked by a well-defined progression of increasing rank that does increase with depth, and the combination of depth of burial and geothermal gradient essentially determine the rank of coal. Water, carbon dioxide and methane are generated during the progressive coalification.

      Methane is the predominant gas generated in the bituminous coal and anthracite stages of coalification, and the carbon dioxide produced at lower ranks is typically flushed out of the coal by methane. The sorption capacity of coal increases with rank. Typically, high-rank coal can absorb more gas and the adsorptive capacity of coal for methane increases with coal rank. The sorption capacity of coal can be influenced by different intrusions and by the tectonic events such as folding and faulting. Coals near igneous intrusions, such as dykes, may contain calcites and pyrites which are likely to influence the ability of gases to drain.

Coal rank DoB MT C VM CV M
Lignite 650-4,900 25-45 60 49-53 23,000 30-50
Subbituminous 4,900-8,200 45-75 71-77 42-49 29,300 10-30
Bituminous 8,200-19,500 75-180 77-87 29-42 36,250 5-10
Anthracite >19,500 >180 87-92 8-29 >38,000 <5

      Key:

      DoB: approximate depth of burial, feet.

      MT: approximate maximum temperature during burial, °C.

      C: approximate carbon content, % w/w dry ash-free basis.

      VM: approximate volatile matter, % w/w dry, ash-free basis.

      CV: approximate calorific value (heat content), ash-free basis.

      M: approximate moisture content, % w/w (in situ).

      It is also factual that marine fossils such as fish, mollusks, and brachiopods occur in coal. Coal balls, which are rounded masses of matted and exceptionally well-preserved plant and animal fossils (including marine creatures) are found within coal strata and associated with coal strata (Mamay and Yochelson, 1962). Since there is little anatomical evidence suggesting that coal plants were adapted to marine swamps, the occurrence of marine animals with non-marine plants suggests mixing during transport, thus favoring the allochthonous model (Rupke, 1969; Cohen, 1970).

      Many factors determine the composition of coal: (i) the mode of accumulation and burial of the plant debris forming the deposits, (ii) the age of the deposits and the geographical distribution, (iii) the structure of the coal-forming plants, particularly details of structure that affect chemical composition or resistance to decay, (iv) the chemical composition of the coal-forming debris and its resistance to decay, (v) the nature and intensity of the peat-decaying agencies, and (vi) the subsequent geological history of the residual products of decay of the plant debris forming the deposits. In short, coal composition is subject to site-specific effects and is difficult to generalize on a global basis (Speight, 2013).

      In summary, there are advantages and disadvantages of both theories. While the coal purist may favor one or the other, there are the pragmatists who will recognize the merits of both theories. Whichever theory is correct (if that is possible) and whatever the origin of coal, there are expected to be differences in properties and behavior.

      Finally, Hilt’s law is a geological term that states the deeper the coal seam, the deeper the rank (grade) of the coal – i.e., anthracite would be expected to lie in deeper buried seams than lignite (Figure 1.1) (Elphick and Suggate, 1964; Suggate, 1974; Ward, 2008). The law holds true if the thermal gradient is entirely vertical, but metamorphism may cause