AS, Murray JA. Opiate‐induced oesophageal dysmotility. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 31(5):601–6.
15 15 Ratuapli SK, Crowell MD, DiBaise JK, et al. Opioid‐induced esophageal dysfunction (OIED) in patients on chronic opioids. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 110(7):979–84.
16 16 Marsh JK, Hoffman SM, Dmuchowski CF. Effect of intravenous midazolam on esophageal motility testing in normal human volunteers. Am J Gastroenterol 1993; 88(6):860–3.
17 17 Fung KP, Math MV, Ho CO, et al. Midazolam as a sedative in esophageal manometry: a study of the effect on esophageal motility. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1992; 15(1):85–8.
18 18 Penagini R, Bianchi PA. Effect of morphine on gastroesophageal reflux and transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation. Gastroenterology 1997; 113(2):409–14.
19 19 Savilampi J, Magnuson A, Ahlstrand R. Effects of remifentanil on esophageal motility: a double‐blind, randomized, cross‐over study in healthy volunteers. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2015; 59(9):1126–36.
20 20 Babaei A, Lin EC, Szabo A, et al. Determinants of pressure drift in Manoscan esophageal high‐resolution manometry system. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2015; 27(2):277–84.
21 21 Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Kahrilas PJ, et al. Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012.
22 22 Xiao Y, Read A, Nicodeme F, et al. The effect of a sitting vs supine posture on normative esophageal pressure topography metrics and Chicago classification diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012; 24(10):e509–16.
23 23 Sweis R, Anggiansah A, Wong T, et al. Normative values and inter‐observer agreement for liquid and solid bolus swallows in upright and supine positions as assessed by esophageal high‐resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2011; 23(6):509–e198.
24 24 Tolone S, Savarino E, Zaninotto G, et al. High‐resolution manometry is superior to endoscopy and radiology in assessing and grading sliding hiatal hernia: A comparison with surgical in vivo evaluation. United European Gastroenterol J 2018; 6(7):981–9.
25 25 Nicodeme F, Pipa‐Muniz M, Khanna K, et al. Quantifying esophagogastric junction contractility with a novel HRM topographic metric, the EGJ‐contractile integral: normative values and preliminary evaluation in PPI non‐responders. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014; 26(3):353–60.
26 26 Hoshino M, Sundaram A, Juhasz A, et al. High‐resolution impedance manometry findings in patients with nutcracker esophagus. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 27(3):592–7.
27 27 Pandolfino JE, Bianchi LK, Lee TJ, et al. Esophagogastric junction morphology predicts susceptibility to exercise‐induced reflux. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99(8):1430–6.
28 28 Jasper D, Freitas‐Queiroz N, Hollenstein M, et al. Prolonged measurement improves the assessment of the barrier function of the esophago‐gastric junction by high‐resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017; 29(2).
29 29 Wang D, Patel A, Mello M, et al. Esophagogastric junction contractile integral (EGJ‐CI) quantifies changes in EGJ barrier function with surgical intervention. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2016; 28(5):639–46.
30 30 Xie C, Wang J, Li Y, et al. Esophagogastric junction contractility integral reflect the anti‐reflux barrier dysfunction in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017; 23(1):27–33.
31 31 Ham H, Cho YK, Lee HH, et al. Esophagogastric junction contractile integral and morphology: Two high‐resolution manometry metrics of the anti‐reflux barrier. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 32(8):1443–9.
32 32 Spechler SJ, Castell DO. Classification of oesophageal motility abnormalities. Gut 2001; 49(1):145–51.
33 33 Pandolfino JE, Ghosh SK, Zhang Q, et al. Quantifying EGJ morphology and relaxation with high‐resolution manometry: a study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2006; 290(5):G1033–40.
34 34 Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE, Rice J, et al. Impaired deglutitive EGJ relaxation in clinical esophageal manometry: a quantitative analysis of 400 patients and 75 controls. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2007; 293(4):G878–85.
35 35 Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE, Zhang Q, et al. Quantifying esophageal peristalsis with high‐resolution manometry: a study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2006; 290(5):G988–97.
36 36 Roman S, Pandolfino JE, Chen J, et al. Phenotypes and clinical context of hypercontractility in high‐resolution esophageal pressure topography (EPT). Am J Gastroenterol 2011.
37 37 Xiao Y, Kahrilas PJ, Kwasny MJ, et al. High‐resolution manometry correlates of ineffective esophageal motility. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107(11):1647–54.
38 38 Behar J, Biancani P. Pathogenesis of simultaneous esophageal contractions in patients with motility disorders. Gastroenterology 1993; 105(1):111–8.
39 39 Pandolfino JE, Roman S, Carlson D, et al. Distal esophageal spasm in high‐resolution esophageal pressure topography: defining clinical phenotypes. Gastroenterology 2011; 141(2):469–75.
40 40 Roman S, Lin Z, Pandolfino JE, et al. Distal contraction latency: a measure of propagation velocity optimized for esophageal pressure topography studies. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106(3):443–51.
41 41 Pandolfino JE, Leslie E, Luger D, et al. The contractile deceleration point: an important physiologic landmark on oesophageal pressure topography. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2010; 22(4):395–400, e90.
42 42 Pandolfino JE, Kwiatek MA, Nealis T, et al. Achalasia: a new clinically relevant classification by high‐resolution manometry. Gastroenterology 2008; 135(5):1526–33.
43 43 Rohof WO, Salvador R, Annese V, et al. Outcomes of treatment for achalasia depend on manometric subtype. Gastroenterology 2013; 144(4):718–25; quiz e13–4.
44 44 Pratap N, Kalapala R, Darisetty S, et al. Achalasia cardia subtyping by high‐resolution manometry predicts the therapeutic outcome of pneumatic balloon dilatation. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2011; 17(1):48–53.
45 45 Salvador R, Costantini M, Zaninotto G, et al. The preoperative manometric pattern predicts the outcome of surgical treatment for esophageal achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg 2010; 14(11):1635–45.
46 46 Khan MA, Kumbhari V, Ngamruengphong S, et al. Is POEM the answer for management of spastic esophageal disorders? A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Dig Dis Sci 2017; 62(1):35–44.
47 47 Scherer JR, Kwiatek MA, Soper NJ, et al. Functional esophagogastric junction obstruction with intact peristalsis: a heterogeneous syndrome sometimes akin to achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg 2009; 13(12):2219–25.
48 48 van Hoeij FB, Smout AJ, Bredenoord AJ. Characterization of idiopathic esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2015; 27(9):1310–6.
49 49 Clayton SB, Patel R, Richter JE. Functional and anatomic esophagogastic junction outflow obstruction: manometry, timed barium esophagram findings, and treatment outcomes. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 14(6):907–11.
50 50 Schupack D, Katzka DA, Geno DM, et al. The clinical significance of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction and hypercontractile esophagus in high resolution esophageal manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017; 29(10):1–9.
51 51 Babaei A, Shad S, Szabo A, et al. Pharmacologic interrogation of patients with esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction using amyl nitrite. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2019; 31(9):e13668.
52 52 Perez‐Fernandez MT, Santander C, Marinero A, et al. Characterization and follow‐up of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction detected by high resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2016; 28(1):116–26.
53 53 Lin Z, Kahrilas PJ, Roman S, et al. Refining the criterion for an abnormal integrated relaxation pressure in esophageal pressure topography based on the pattern of esophageal contractility using a classification and regression tree model. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012; 24(8):e356–63.
54 54