a focus on achalasia syndromes. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 15(5):323.
55 55 Gyawali CP, Sifrim D, Carlson DA, et al. Ineffective esophageal motility: Concepts, future directions, and conclusions from the Stanford 2018 symposium. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2019; 31(9):e13584.
56 56 Gyawali CP, Kahrilas PJ, Savarino E, et al. Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus. Gut 2018; 67(7):1351–62.
57 57 Gyawali CP, Roman S, Bredenoord AJ, et al. Classification of esophageal motor findings in gastro‐esophageal reflux disease: Conclusions from an international consensus group. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017;29(12).
58 58 Shaker A, Stoikes N, Drapekin J, et al. Multiple rapid swallow responses during esophageal high‐resolution manometry reflect esophageal body peristaltic reserve. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108(11):1706–12.
59 59 Tutuian R, Castell DO. Clarification of the esophageal function defect in patients with manometric ineffective esophageal motility: studies using combined impedance‐manometry. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2(3):230–6.
60 60 Omari TI, Dejaeger E, van Beckevoort D, et al. A method to objectively assess swallow function in adults with suspected aspiration. Gastroenterology 2011; 140(5):1454–63.
61 61 Myers JC, Nguyen NQ, Jamieson GG, et al. Susceptibility to dysphagia after fundoplication revealed by novel automated impedance manometry analysis. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012; 24(9):812–e393.
62 62 Rommel N, Van Oudenhove L, Tack J, et al. Automated impedance manometry analysis as a method to assess esophageal function. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014; 26(5):636–45.
63 63 Omari TI, Ciucci M, Gozdzikowska K, et al. High‐resolution pharyngeal manometry and impedance: protocols and metrics‐recommendations of a high‐resolution pharyngeal manometry international working group. Dysphagia 2019.
64 64 Omari TI, Dejaeger E, Van Beckevoort D, et al. A novel method for the nonradiological assessment of ineffective swallowing. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106(10):1796–802.
65 65 Rohof WO, Myers JC, Estremera FA, et al. Inter‐ and intra‐rater reproducibility of automated and integrated pressure‐flow analysis of esophageal pressure‐impedance recordings. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014; 26(2):168–75.
66 66 Singendonk MJ, Lin Z, Scheerens C, et al. High‐resolution impedance manometry parameters in the evaluation of esophageal function of non‐obstructive dysphagia patients. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2018:e13505.
67 67 Lin Z, Nicodeme F, Lin CY, et al. Parameters for quantifying bolus retention with high‐resolution impedance manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014; 26(7):929–36.
68 68 Carlson DA, Beveridge CA, Lin Z, et al. Improved assessment of bolus clearance in patients with achalasia using high‐resolution impedance manometry. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 16(5):672–80 e1.
69 69 Carlson DA, Lin Z, Kahrilas PJ, et al. High‐resolution impedance manometry metrics of the esophagogastric junction for the assessment of treatment response in achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol 2016; 111(12):1702–10.
70 70 Carlson DA, Omari T, Lin Z, et al. High‐resolution impedance manometry parameters enhance the esophageal motility evaluation in non‐obstructive dysphagia patients without a major Chicago Classification motility disorder. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017; 29(3).
71 71 Cho YK, Lipowska AM, Nicodeme F, et al. Assessing bolus retention in achalasia using high‐resolution manometry with impedance: a comparator study with timed barium esophagram. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109(6):829–35.
72 72 Stanghellini V, Chan FK, Hasler WL, et al. Gastroduodenal disorders. Gastroenterology 2016; 150(6):1380–92.
73 73 Kessing BF, Bredenoord AJ, Smout AJ. Mechanisms of gastric and supragastric belching: a study using concurrent high‐resolution manometry and impedance monitoring. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012; 24(12):e573–9.
74 74 Kessing BF, Bredenoord AJ, Smout AJ. Objective manometric criteria for the rumination syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109(1):52–9.
75 75 Kessing BF, Bredenoord AJ, Velosa M, et al. Supragastric belches are the main determinants of troublesome belching symptoms in patients with gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2012; 35(9):1073–9.
76 76 Yadlapati R, Tye M, Roman S, et al. Postprandial high‐resolution impedance manometry identifies mechanisms of nonresponse to proton pump inhibitors. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017.
77 77 Halland M, Parthasarathy G, Bharucha AE, et al. Diaphragmatic breathing for rumination syndrome: efficacy and mechanisms of action. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2016; 28(3):384–91.
78 78 Triggs JR, Carlson DA, Beveridge C, et al. Upright integrated relaxation pressure facilitates characterization of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019.
79 79 Fornari F, Bravi I, Penagini R, et al. Multiple rapid swallowing: a complementary test during standard oesophageal manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2009; 21(7):718–e41.
80 80 Martinucci I, Savarino EV, Pandolfino JE, et al. Vigor of peristalsis during multiple rapid swallows is inversely correlated with acid exposure time in patients with NERD. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2016; 28(2):243–50.
81 81 Hasak S, Brunt LM, Wang D, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with postfundoplication dysphagia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17(10):1982–90.
82 82 Daum C, Sweis R, Kaufman E, et al. Failure to respond to physiologic challenge characterizes esophageal motility in erosive gastro‐esophageal reflux disease. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2011; 23(6):517–e200.
83 83 Elvevi A, Mauro A, Pugliese D, et al. Usefulness of low‐ and high‐volume multiple rapid swallowing during high‐resolution manometry. Dig Liver Dis 2015; 47(2):103–7.
84 84 Ang D, Hollenstein M, Misselwitz B, et al. Rapid drink challenge in high‐resolution manometry: an adjunctive test for detection of esophageal motility disorders. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017; 29(1).
85 85 Marin I, Cisternas D, Abrao L, et al. Normal values of esophageal pressure responses to a rapid drink challenge test in healthy subjects: results of a multicenter study. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017; 29(6).
86 86 Biasutto D, Mion F, Garros A, et al. Rapid drink challenge test during esophageal high resolution manometry in patients with esophago‐gastric junction outflow obstruction. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2018; 30(6):e13293.
87 87 Marin I, Serra J. Patterns of esophageal pressure responses to a rapid drink challenge test in patients with esophageal motility disorders. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2016; 28(4):543–53.
88 88 Xiao Y, Nicodeme F, Kahrilas PJ, et al. Optimizing the swallow protocol of clinical high‐resolution esophageal manometry studies. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012; 24(10):e489–96.
89 89 Bogte A, Bredenoord AJ, Oors J, et al. Relationship between esophageal contraction patterns and clearance of swallowed liquid and solid boluses in healthy controls and patients with dysphagia. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012; 24(8):e364–72.
90 90 Hollenstein M, Thwaites P, Butikofer S, et al. Pharyngeal swallowing and oesophageal motility during a solid meal test: a prospective study in healthy volunteers and patients with major motility disorders. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 2(9):644–53.
91 91 Sweis R, Anggiansah A, Wong T, et al. Assessment of esophageal dysfunction and symptoms during and after a standardized test meal: development and clinical validation of a new methodology utilizing high‐resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2014; 26(2):215–28.
92 92 Ang D, Misselwitz B, Hollenstein M, et al. Diagnostic yield of high‐resolution manometry with a solid test meal for clinically relevant, symptomatic oesophageal motility disorders: serial diagnostic study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 2(9):654–61.
93 93 Wang YT, Tai LF, Yazaki E, et al. Investigation of dysphagia after antireflux surgery by high‐resolution manometry: impact of multiple water swallows and a solid test meal on diagnosis, management, and clinical