Группа авторов

Bovine Reproduction


Скачать книгу

Breed Age at puberty (months) Paired testes weight (g) Reference
Low nutrition Control High nutrition Low nutrition Control High nutrition
Angus and Angus × Charolais 10.3–10.8 9.6 528–553 600 [86]
Angus and Angus × Charolais 10.7 10.3 531 611 [87]
Angus and Angus × Charolais 10.5 9.8 9.4 520 549 655 [88]
Holstein 10.6 9.9 535 636 [89]
Holstein 12.1 10.7 10.6 562 611 727 [90]
Holstein 10.4–10.6 9.3–9.8 594–627 658–660 [91]

      

      The effects of nutrition on sexual development and reproductive function in bulls are mediated through the hypothalamic–pituitary–testes axis. Nutrition affects the gonadotropin‐releasing hormone (GnRH) pulse generator in the hypothalamus, since differences in luteinizing hormone (LH) pulse secretion in bulls receiving different nutrition can be observed even in the absence of differences in pituitary LH secretion capability as determined by GnRH challenge [87, 88]. Interestingly, though, when low nutrition was imposed on bulls by limiting the amount of nutrients in a ration fed ad libitum, only reduced LH pulse frequency was observed, whereas reduced LH pulse frequency, mean and peak concentrations, and secretion after GnRH challenge were observed when nutrition was controlled by restricting the availability of food [86]. These results seem to indicate that the inhibitory effects of limited availability of nutrients on LH secretion appeared to be exerted only on the hypothalamus, whereas the combination of limited availability of nutrients and the sensation of hunger experienced by bulls with restricted intake affected both hypothalamic and pituitary function, producing a much more severe inhibition of LH secretion. The effect of nutrition on Leydig cell number and/or function in bulls receiving different diets was demonstrated by differences in testosterone secretion after GnRH challenge even in the absence of differences in LH secretion after the challenge [87, 88].

      Several studies reported in the literature describe the effects of nutrition only during the pubertal period, in other words after the initial hormonal changes that regulate sexual development have occurred. In general, these studies indicate that low nutrition has adverse effects on growth and sexual development. In one study, bulls receiving one‐third of the amount supplied to their twin controls had lower body and vesicular gland weights, vesicular gland fructose and citric acid contents, and circulating and testicular testosterone concentrations, whereas circulating androstenedione concentrations were increased [94]. In another series of experiments, beef bulls 8–12 months old receiving diets with low levels of crude protein (8, 5, and 1.5%) for periods of three to six months had markedly reduced testes, epididymis, and seminal glands weights compared with control bulls fed diets containing 14% crude protein. Moreover, seminiferous tubule diameter and seminiferous epithelium thickness were smaller in bulls with a restricted protein intake [95, 96].

      Although low nutrition during the pubertal period has adverse effects on reproductive function, the potential beneficial effects of high nutrition after weaning are questionable at best. Effects of energy on sexual development were not consistent in a study with Simmental and Hereford bulls fed diets with a low, medium, or high energy content (approximately 14, 18, and 23 Mcal/day, respectively) from 7 to 14 months