Группа авторов

American Environmental History


Скачать книгу

and upwards; and east and west, further than yet hath been discovered) is proper to the king of England, yet letting that pass – lest I be thought to meddle further than it concerns me or further than I have discerning – I will mention such things as are within my reach, knowledge, sight, and practice, since I have travailed in these affairs.

      And first, seeing we daily pray for the conversion of the heathens, we must consider whether there be not some ordinary means and course for us to take to convert them, or whether prayer for them be only referred to God’s extraordinary work from heaven. Now it seemeth unto me that we ought also to endeavor and use the means to convert them; or they [ought to] come to us. To us they cannot come, [for] our land is full; to them we may go, [since] their land is empty.

      This then is a sufficient reason to prove our going thither to live lawful: their land is spacious and void, and they are few and do but run over the grass, as do also the foxes and wild beasts. They are not industrious, neither have [they] art, science, skill, or faculty to use either the land or the commodities of it; but all spoils, rots, and is marred for want of manuring, gathering, ordering, etc. As the ancient patriarchs therefore removed from straiter places into more roomy [ones], where the land lay idle and wasted and none used it, though there dwelt inhabitants by them (as in Gen. 13:6, 11, 12, and 34:21, and 41:20), so is it lawful now to take a land which none useth and make use of it.

      Secondly, this composition is also more particular and applicatory, as touching ourselves there inhabiting; [for] the emperor [of the Indians] by a joint consent hath promised and appointed us to live at peace where [ever] we will in all his dominions, taking what place we will and as much land as we will, and bringing as many people as we will, and that for these two causes. First, because we are the servants of James, King of England, whose the land (as he confesseth) is; second, because he hath found us just, honest, kind, and peaceable, and so loves our company. Yea, and that in these things there is no dissimulation on his part, nor fear of breach (except our security engender in them some unthought of treachery, or our incivilities provoke them to anger) is most plain in other relations, which show that the things they did were more out of love than out of fear.

      It being then, first, a vast and empty chaos, secondly, acknowledged the right of our sovereign king, [and] thirdly, by a peaceable composition in part possessed of diverse of his loving subjects, I see not who can doubt or call in question the lawfulness of inhabiting or dwelling there. But [it is clear] that it may be as lawful for such as are not tied upon some special occasion here to live there as well as here; yea, and as the enterprise is weighty and difficult, so the honor is more worthy, to plant a rude wilderness, to enlarge the honor and fame of our dread sovereign, but chiefly to display the efficacy of power of the gospel both in zealous preaching, [and in] professing, and [in] wise walking under it, before the faces of these poor blind infidels….

      Lion Gardener, “Livestock and War in Colonial New England”

      (Excerpt from “Leift Lion Gardener: this Relation of the Pequot Warres,” Massachusetts Historical Society Collections, 3rd ser. 3 (1833), 154–5.)

      What possibility was there for Indian success in the new market economy without secure title to large grazing and farming parcels?

      * * *