Группа авторов

Emergency Medical Services


Скачать книгу

Wayne MA, McDonnell M. Comparison of traditional versus video laryngoscopy in out‐of‐hospital tracheal intubation. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010; 14:278–2.

      49 49 Guyette FX, Farrell K, Carlson JN, Callaway CW, Phrampus P. Comparison of video laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy in a critical care transport service. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2013; 17:149–54.

      50 50 Cooper RM. Complications associated with the use of the GlideScope videolaryngoscope. Can J Anaesth. 2007; 54:54–57.

      51 51 Guyette FX, Wang H, Cole JS. King airway use by air medical providers. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2007; 11:473–76.

      52 52 Schalk R, Byhahn C, Fausel F, et al. Out‐of‐hospital airway management by paramedics and emergency physicians using laryngeal tubes. Resuscitation. 2010; 81:323–26.

      53 53 Guyette FX, Greenwood MJ, Neubecker D, Roth R, Wang HE. Alternate airways in the prehospital setting (resource document to NAEMSP position statement). Prehosp Emerg Care. 2007; 11:56–61.

      54 54 Committees on Emergency Cardiac Care. 2005 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Part 1: Introduction. Circulation. 2005; 112:IV1–5.

      55 55 Fales W, Farrell R. Impact of new resuscitation guidelines on out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest survival. Acad Emerg Med. 2007; 14:S157–8.

      56 56 Wang HE, Mann NC, Mears G, Jacobson K, Yealy DM. Out‐of‐hospital airway management in the United States. Resuscitation. 2011; 82:378–85.

      57 57 Gahan K, Studnek JR, Vandeventer S. King LT‐D use by urban basic life support first responders as the primary airway device for out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2011; 82:1525–8.

      58 58 Hubble MW, Wilfong DA, Brown LH, Hertelendy A, Benner RW. A meta‐analysis of prehospital airway control techniques part II: alternative airway devices and cricothyrotomy success rates. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010; 14:515–30.

      59 59 Spaite DW, Joseph M. Prehospital cricothyrotomy: an investigation of indications, technique, complications, and patient outcome. Ann Emerg Med. 1990; 19:279–85.

      60 60 Robinson KJ, Katz R, Jacobs LM. A 12‐year experience with prehospital cricothyrotomies. Air Med J. 2001; 20:27–30.

      61 61 Nwanne T, Jarvis J, Barton D, Donnelly JP, Wang HE. Advanced airway management success rates in a national cohort of emergency medical services agencies. Resuscitation. 2020; 146:43–49.

      62 62 Leibovici D, Fredman B, Gofrit ON, Shemer J, Blumenfeld A, Shapira SC. Prehospital cricothyroidotomy by physicians. Am J Emerg Med. 1997; 15:91–93.

      63 63 Boyle MF, Hatton D, Sheets C. Surgical cricothyrotomy performed by air ambulance flight nurses: a 5‐year experience. J Emerg Med. 1993; 11:41–45.

      64 64 Gerich TG, Schmidt U, Hubrich V, Lobenhoffer HP, Tscherne H. Prehospital airway management in the acutely injured patient: the role of surgical cricothyrotomy revisited. J Trauma. 1998; 45:312–4.

      65 65 Xeropotamos NS, Coats TJ, Wilson AW. Prehospital surgical airway management: 1 year's experience from the helicopter emergency medical service. Injury. 1993; 24:222–4.

      66 66 Ritter SC, Guyette FX. Prehospital pediatric King LT‐D use: a pilot study. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011; 15:401–4.

      67 67 Mitchell MS, Lee White M, King WD, Wang HE. Paramedic King Laryngeal Tube airway insertion versus endotracheal intubation in simulated pediatric respiratory arrest. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2012; 16:284–8.

      68 68 Johnston BD, Seitz SR, Wang HE. Limited opportunities for paramedic student endotracheal intubation training in the operating room. Acad Emerg Med. 2006; 13:1051–5.

      69 69 Committee on Accreditation of Educational Programs for the Emergency Medical Services Profession. Standards and Guidelines. Airway Management. https://coaemsp.org/caahep‐standards‐and‐guidelines#3. Accessed September 14, 2020.

      70 70 Wang HE, Kupas DF, Hostler D, Cooney R, Yealy DM, Lave JR. Procedural experience with out‐of‐hospital endotracheal intubation. Crit Care Med. 2005; 33:1718–21.

      71 71 Hall RE, Plant JR, Bands CJ, Wall AR, Kang J, Hall CA. Human patient simulation is effective for teaching paramedic students endotracheal intubation. Acad Emerg Med. 2005; 12:850–5.

      72 72 Wang HE, Kupas DF, Greenwood MJ, et al. An algorithmic approach to prehospital airway management. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2005; 9:145–55.

      73 73 Steadman RH, Coates WC, Huang YM, et al. Simulation‐based training is superior to problem‐based learning for the acquisition of critical assessment and management skills. Crit Care Med. 2006; 34:151–7.

      74 74 Barsuk D, Ziv A, Lin G, et al. Using advanced simulation for recognition and correction of gaps in airway and breathing management skills in prehospital trauma care. Anesth Analgesia. 2005; 100:803–9.

      75 75 Wang HE, Domeier RM, Kupas DF, Greenwood MJ, O'Connor RE, National Association of EMSP. Recommended guidelines for uniform reporting of data from out‐of‐hospital airway management: position statement of the National Association of EMS Physicians. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2004; 8:58–72.

      76 76 Reichert RJ, Gothard M, Gothard MD, Schwartz HP, Bigham MT. Intubation Success in Critical Care Transport: A Multicenter Study. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2018; 22:571–577.

      77 77 Spaite DW, Bobrow BJ, Keim SM, et al. Association of statewide implementation of the prehospital traumatic brain injury treatment guidelines with patient survival following traumatic brain injury: the Excellence in Prehospital Injury Care (EPIC) study. JAMA Surg. 2019; 154:e191152.

       Jestin N. Carlson and Henry E. Wang

      Airway management is one of the most important considerations during prehospital care of critically ill or injured patients. This chapter provides an overview of the procedures and techniques that are integral to prehospital airway management.

      Whenever an EMS clinician performs an airway intervention, it is essential to ensure the safety of that individual and that of others in close proximity. The recent SARS‐CoV2 (COVID‐19) pandemic has highlighted the importance of personal protective equipment (PPE) during airway management. At minimum, PPE should include a facemask, face shield, and gloves. In situations where COVID‐19 or other communicable disease is a possible underlying condition, rescuers should consider using a particulate filtering mask (N95 or similar respirator), face shield, gown, and gloves (see Chapter 23) [1]. All rescuers assisting with care of the patients should wear the same level of PPE during the procedure.

      Oxygen cannulas and face masks

      In spontaneously breathing patients, EMS personnel may deliver supplemental oxygen using nasal cannulas or oxygen masks. The nasal cannula provides low‐flow (2–5 L/min) oxygen in inhaled fractions (FiO2) from 0.2 to 0.4 (for convenience we will use the percentage convention: 20%–40%). Oxygen masks used in the prehospital setting include simple facemasks (6–10 L/min oxygen delivery, 40%–60% FiO2) and nonrebreather masks (10–15 L/min oxygen delivery, close to 100% FiO2).

      Nasal cannulas and facemasks are designed for patients with spontaneous respiratory drive and intact protective airway reflexes. Patients with frank respiratory compromise or apnea should receive bag‐valve‐mask (BVM) ventilation support or advanced airway management.

      Bag‐valve‐mask