Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How do you assess your Message Queuing as a Service workforce capability and capacity needs, including skills, competencies, and staffing levels?
<--- Score
2. For your Message Queuing as a Service project, identify and describe the business environment, is there more than one layer to the business environment?
<--- Score
3. How are you going to measure success?
<--- Score
4. What are the stakeholder objectives to be achieved with Message Queuing as a Service?
<--- Score
5. What creative shifts do you need to take?
<--- Score
6. How do you take a forward-looking perspective in identifying Message Queuing as a Service research related to market response and models?
<--- Score
7. Whom do you really need or want to serve?
<--- Score
8. How do you recognize an objection?
<--- Score
9. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in Message Queuing as a Service? In other words, what are the risks, if Message Queuing as a Service does not deliver successfully?
<--- Score
10. What Message Queuing as a Service events should you attend?
<--- Score
11. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Message Queuing as a Service delivery, for example is new software needed?
<--- Score
12. Who needs budgets?
<--- Score
13. What situation(s) led to this Message Queuing as a Service Self Assessment?
<--- Score
14. Who needs to know about Message Queuing as a Service?
<--- Score
15. Are employees recognized for desired behaviors?
<--- Score
16. Is it needed?
<--- Score
17. Will a response program recognize when a crisis occurs and provide some level of response?
<--- Score
18. How can auditing be a preventative security measure?
<--- Score
19. Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?
<--- Score
20. Do you have/need 24-hour access to key personnel?
<--- Score
21. What Message Queuing as a Service problem should be solved?
<--- Score
22. What would happen if Message Queuing as a Service weren’t done?
<--- Score
23. How are the Message Queuing as a Service’s objectives aligned to the group’s overall stakeholder strategy?
<--- Score
24. To what extent would your organization benefit from being recognized as a award recipient?
<--- Score
25. Are employees recognized or rewarded for performance that demonstrates the highest levels of integrity?
<--- Score
26. Why is this needed?
<--- Score
27. What needs to be done?
<--- Score
28. What activities does the governance board need to consider?
<--- Score
29. How many trainings, in total, are needed?
<--- Score
30. How does it fit into your organizational needs and tasks?
<--- Score
31. Have you identified your Message Queuing as a Service key performance indicators?
<--- Score
32. Are there regulatory / compliance issues?
<--- Score
33. Are your goals realistic? Do you need to redefine your problem? Perhaps the problem has changed or maybe you have reached your goal and need to set a new one?
<--- Score
34. Looking at each person individually – does every one have the qualities which are needed to work in this group?
<--- Score
35. Are controls defined to recognize and contain problems?
<--- Score
36. Who are your key stakeholders who need to sign off?
<--- Score
37. What Message Queuing as a Service coordination do you need?
<--- Score
38. Who else hopes to benefit from it?
<--- Score
39. To what extent does each concerned units management team recognize Message Queuing as a Service as an effective investment?
<--- Score
40. Who needs what information?
<--- Score
41. Which information does the Message Queuing as a Service business case need to include?
<--- Score
42. What are the clients issues and concerns?
<--- Score
43. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?
<--- Score
44. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?
<--- Score
45. Are there any revenue recognition issues?
<--- Score
46. What are the minority interests and what amount of minority interests can be recognized?
<--- Score
47. How do you identify subcontractor relationships?
<--- Score
48. What is the problem and/or vulnerability?
<--- Score
49. Which needs are not included or involved?
<--- Score
50. What do employees need in the short term?
<--- Score
51. What vendors make products that address the Message Queuing as a Service needs?
<--- Score
52. What else needs to be measured?
<--- Score
53. Who should resolve