Who approved the Risk and Safety Statement scope?
<--- Score
62. Is Risk and Safety Statement currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
63. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
64. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
65. What is the context?
<--- Score
66. Are the Risk and Safety Statement requirements testable?
<--- Score
67. How do you manage changes in Risk and Safety Statement requirements?
<--- Score
68. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
69. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
70. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
71. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
72. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
73. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
74. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
75. What are the record-keeping requirements of Risk and Safety Statement activities?
<--- Score
76. Have all basic functions of Risk and Safety Statement been defined?
<--- Score
77. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
78. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
79. How will the Risk and Safety Statement team and the group measure complete success of Risk and Safety Statement?
<--- Score
80. What is the scope of the Risk and Safety Statement work?
<--- Score
81. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Risk and Safety Statement leverage and how?
<--- Score
82. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
83. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
84. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
85. How do you manage unclear Risk and Safety Statement requirements?
<--- Score
86. What sources do you use to gather information for a Risk and Safety Statement study?
<--- Score
87. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
88. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
89. How did the Risk and Safety Statement manager receive input to the development of a Risk and Safety Statement improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
90. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
91. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
92. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
93. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
94. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
95. Is there a clear Risk and Safety Statement case definition?
<--- Score
96. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
97. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Risk and Safety Statement results are met?
<--- Score
98. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
99. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
100. Will team members regularly document their Risk and Safety Statement work?
<--- Score
101. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
102. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
103. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
104. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
105. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Risk and Safety Statement? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
106. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Risk and Safety Statement brings?
<--- Score
107. Is special Risk and Safety Statement user knowledge required?
<--- Score
108. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
109. How does the Risk and Safety Statement manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
110. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
111. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
112. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Risk and Safety Statement goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
113. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
114. What are the core elements of the Risk and Safety Statement business case?
<--- Score
115.