Score
117. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Critical Incident Response Team results are met?
<--- Score
118. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Critical Incident Response Team brings?
<--- Score
119. Will team members perform Critical Incident Response Team work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
120. How are consistent Critical Incident Response Team definitions important?
<--- Score
121. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
122. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
123. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
124. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
125. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
126. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
127. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
128. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
129. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Critical Incident Response Team?
<--- Score
130. Will a Critical Incident Response Team production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
131. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
132. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
133. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
134. What is the context?
<--- Score
135. What would be the goal or target for a Critical Incident Response Team’s improvement team?
<--- Score
136. Is there a Critical Incident Response Team management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
137. Who is gathering Critical Incident Response Team information?
<--- Score
138. What are (control) requirements for Critical Incident Response Team Information?
<--- Score
139. Who approved the Critical Incident Response Team scope?
<--- Score
140. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Critical Incident Response Team Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What are the Critical Incident Response Team investment costs?
<--- Score
2. How do you verify your resources?
<--- Score
3. What drives O&M cost?
<--- Score
4. At what cost?
<--- Score
5. What is your Critical Incident Response Team quality cost segregation study?
<--- Score
6. How do you measure success?
<--- Score
7. Has a cost center been established?
<--- Score
8. Where is the cost?
<--- Score
9. What measurements are being captured?
<--- Score
10. What are your customers expectations and measures?
<--- Score
11. Are there competing Critical Incident Response Team priorities?
<--- Score
12. How do you verify the authenticity of the data and information used?
<--- Score
13. What could cause you to change course?
<--- Score
14. What does verifying compliance entail?
<--- Score
15. Are there measurements based on task performance?
<--- Score
16. How do you quantify and qualify impacts?
<--- Score
17. Are missed Critical Incident Response Team opportunities costing your organization money?
<--- Score
18. Is there an opportunity to verify requirements?
<--- Score
19. What are the strategic priorities for this year?
<--- Score
20. What would be a real cause for concern?
<--- Score
21. Are supply costs steady or fluctuating?
<--- Score
22. How to cause the change?
<--- Score
23. How can you reduce costs?
<--- Score
24. What could cause delays in the schedule?
<--- Score
25. What happens if cost savings do not materialize?
<--- Score
26. Are actual costs in line with budgeted costs?
<--- Score
27. What would it cost to replace your technology?
<--- Score
28. Have design-to-cost goals been established?
<--- Score
29.