Gerardus Blokdyk

Information Criteria A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition


Скачать книгу

reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      13. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      14. How do you catch Information criteria definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      15. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      16. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      17. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      18. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Information criteria results are met?

      <--- Score

      19. How do you hand over Information criteria context?

      <--- Score

      20. What are the Information criteria use cases?

      <--- Score

      21. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      22. Has a Information criteria requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      23. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      24. How do you think the partners involved in Information criteria would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      25. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      26. Is there any additional Information criteria definition of success?

      <--- Score

      27. How did the Information criteria manager receive input to the development of a Information criteria improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      28. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      29. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Information criteria leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      30. Do you have a Information criteria success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      31. How would you define Information criteria leadership?

      <--- Score

      32. Is there a critical path to deliver Information criteria results?

      <--- Score

      33. What would be the goal or target for a Information criteria’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      34. What are the record-keeping requirements of Information criteria activities?

      <--- Score

      35. Is Information criteria linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      36. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Information criteria? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      37. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      38. Do you all define Information criteria in the same way?

      <--- Score

      39. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      40. What is the definition of Information criteria excellence?

      <--- Score

      41. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      42. Why are you doing Information criteria and what is the scope?

      <--- Score

      43. When is/was the Information criteria start date?

      <--- Score

      44. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Information criteria?

      <--- Score

      45. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      46. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      47. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      48. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      49. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      50. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      51. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      52. How do you manage changes in Information criteria requirements?

      <--- Score

      53. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      54. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      55. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      56. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      57. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      58. What sources do you use to gather information for a Information criteria study?

      <--- Score

      59. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      60. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      61. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      62. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      63. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      64. Is there a Information criteria management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

      <--- Score

      65. How do you manage unclear Information criteria requirements?

      <--- Score

      66. What Information criteria services do you require?

      <--- Score

      67. How do you manage scope?

      <---