Группа авторов

Energy


Скачать книгу

relating to the oil industry.

      Mobilizing and encouraging environmental and emission control activities to cope effectively with the emerging oil industry.

      Construction of offshore wind turbines and other related marine‐based renewable energy technologies to further transition away from fossil fuel dependency.

      Restoration of coastal habitats containing mangroves and salt marshes that are used to store carbon and have multiple benefits, such as providing buffers against extreme tropical storms, filtering contaminants and providing an ideal habitat for fish and other types of wildlife.

      These essential and powerful steps are capable of reducing significantly 21% of pollution by 2050. They will minimize warming to 1.5 °C or just above pre‐industrial levels by the end of the current century.

      Today, the world is caught up in an energy crisis that has adversely affected substantial measures to decrease GHG emissions from the oil industry and to reduce the risk of a global energy crisis.

      Invariably, fossil fuels are a lifeline for human civilization and millions of others around the world. The availability of fuel is not infinite, which is why people are willing to fight for it and to align themselves with their adversaries. Exploration and development are currently underway for other renewable energy sources, most of which have only passed their early stages. The evolution of these technologies can be accelerated by growing government funding and public support, helping free society from the reckless use of fossil fuels. During this massive transition, oil companies will remain resilient because, with the depletion and exhaustion of fossil resources in the future, they would make big profits. To prevent this, it is important to encourage the oil sector and other energy resource companies to look beyond their commercial profits and concentrate on developing alternative strategies when all fossil fuel resources are being depleted.

      We face a terrible global energy crisis, triggered by continued growth in the world’s population, continued reliance on fossil fuels, and increased demand for energy for various purposes. It is well understood that unless the rise in greenhouse gas emissions is prevented or reduced, there will be major turbulence in the global atmosphere, with detrimental effects on human civilization and the economy. Such a stubborn problem needs to be addressed by facilitating cooperation between policymakers and designers in different fields of science, engineering and technology.

      Healthy creation, evolution and use of technology require major steps in the direction of progress. Therefore, to achieve goals of the optimum scale and magnitude within a limited timeframe, policymakers need to be technologically adept, and aware of policymakers’ deeper social and political problems. Similarly, it is also necessary for policymakers to unite with the academic community to achieve technical objectives. The hour’s need is to bring these two main groups together closely, with a primary focus on educating socially relevant and competent engineers and technologists to take care of the decades and centuries ahead.

      Policies have been adapted to fossil fuels in the previous era and have earned ample preferential treatment, while renewable resources, on the other hand, are an aspect of choice. In economists’ opinion, market tax pricing of carbon would allow for more efficient choices between competing technologies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (Burtraw 2008; Parry and Williams 2013).

      The global community is now committed to a consensus on reducing the unhealthful increase in Earth’s temperature to 2 °C and to initiate improvements to achieve this goal. This would make it possible for the planet to abolish the burning of fossil fuels in order to achieve an effective zero‐carbon emission status. Therefore, the need for the hour is for a radical change in the lives of modern humans on the crusade towards a brighter future.

      1 Baumert, K., T. Herzog, J. Pershing. (2005). Navigating the Numbers: Greenhouse Gas Data and International Climate Policy, World Resources Institute.

      2 Fawzy, S., Osman, A., Doran, J., Rooney, D. W. (2020). Strategies for mitigation of climate change: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, pp. 1–26.

      3 Burtraw, Dallas. (2008). Regulating CO2 in electricity markets: sources or consumers? Climate Policy (Earthscan) 8 (6), pp. 588–606.

      4 Canadell, J. (2007). Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104, pp. 18866–18870.

      5 Dias, G.F. (2006). Human Ecological Footprint and Sustainability, Gaia, São Paulo.

      6 den Elzen, M. G. J. & Meinshausen, M. (2006). Meeting the EU 2°C climate target: global and regional emission implications. Climate Policy 6, pp. 545–564.

      7 Field, Christopher B., Vicente, R. Barros, David Jon Dokken, Katherine, J. Mach, Michael D. Mastrandrea, (2014). “Technical summary”, in Christopher B. Field, Vicente R. Barros, David Jon Dokken, Katherine J. Mach, Michael D. Mastrandrea, et al. (eds.) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 35–94.

      8 Friedman, T. (2005). As Toyota goes …. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/17/opinion/17friedman.html (accessed 15 December 2020).

      9 Giddens, A., (2011). The Politics of Climate Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.

      10 Gillett, N., and H. Matthews (2010). Accounting for carbon cycle feedbacks in a comparison of the global warming effects of greenhouse gases. Environmental Research Letters, 5, pp. 034011.

      11 Gregory, J. M., Stouffer, R. J.,