Группа авторов

Energy


Скачать книгу

other solar cells based on advanced technologies. Tuning of the band gap of solar cells using nanoscale composites revealed enhanced power conversion efficiency. These are often termed as third‐generation PV (tandem cells, impurity‐band and intermediate‐band devices, hot‐electron extraction and carrier multiplication) based on nanostructures. In the field of nanotechnology, carbon nanotubes, quantum dots and ‘hot‐carrier’ flat‐plate device based solar PV cells are produced (Razykov et al. 2011).

      Under the crystalline silicon solar cells which are one of the categories of solar PV, there are mono‐crystalline, poly‐crystalline and GaAs‐based solar cells. Mono‐crystalline is still popular among the manufactures due to high efficiency and easy availability; however, its cost is high for both manufactures and end users. So, other cost‐effective options are also evaluated to further decrease the cost, and ploy‐crystalline offers a good deal in terms of production cost. Another alternative under the category of crystalline silicon cell is GaAs‐based solar cells which provides high efficiency, and these are also low‐weight. However, again, its cost is high compared with other types of crystalline solar cells. These are resistant to high heat which makes them suitable for the concentrated PV (used in power generation), hybrid use and space applications (Deb 1998).

      Thin‐film solar cells are of three types, namely amorphous Si, CdS/CdTe and CIS/CIGS (copper indium gallium selenide). Amorphous Si‐based thin‐film solar cells are further classified into three types: single junction, double junction and triple junction (El Chaar et al. 2011). Thin‐film solar cells require less manufacturing materials which makes them cheaper compared with crystalline Si‐based cells. Amorphous Si‐based solar cells have higher absorption rate of light (40 times due to non‐crystalline and disordered structure) which makes them more popular than CdS/CdTe and CIS/CIGS among the same category owing to the higher efficiency of the former (Pandey et al. 2016). Let us consider a particular example of CdTe solar cell, where an experimental study (Soliman et al. 1996) to enhance the characteristics of CdTe showed that to produce better cells, chemical heat treatment is required. Another example in the same category is CIGS which has been popular because of its laboratory‐scale efficiency of about 20.3%. In the area of thin films, there is ongoing research to enhance the efficiency and lifetime of these cells (Pandey et al. 2016).

Schematic illustration of classification of common technologies and system set-up for concentrated solar irradiance conversion.

      Source: Based on ref. Looser et al. (2014).

      Hybrid solar cells offer a right blend of inorganic and organic materials. At present, this type of cells are gaining popularity due to cheap processing techniques of organic materials. Choice of organic and inorganic materials opens various options for the chemical synthesis and molecular design of hybrid solar cells (Pandey et al. 2016). Inorganic part of the cell possesses high charge‐carrier mobility while the organic part has strong optical absorption which makes them one of good options for energy fulfilment.

      DSSCs are simple to manufacture, similar to hybrid solar cells with low cost, low toxicity and ease of production. These cells have the potential in the solar industry in near future. At present, these cells cannot be used in commercialized PV systems owing to their poor efficiency (8–12%), a major concern for the solar cells in this category (Pandey et al. 2016). Recently, a new profitable platinum‐free counter electrode for DSSCs has been reported (Ahmad et al. 2014). Graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) or multi‐wall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), or various weight % of hybrid GNPs and MWCNTs mixtures were used to make counter electrodes. A marginal increase in conversion efficiency was reported in the study. Using Ru (II) dyes, the efficiency of current DSSCs was reported to reach 12% (Sharma et al. 2018), which is still less as compared with the efficiency of the first‐ and second‐generation solar cells (20–30%).

      A different technique in which solar energy is not concentrated is becoming popular in a short span of time. In this technique, flat plates and evacuated tubes are used as solar energy collectors for heating and cooling purposes. This technique is cost‐effective with good efficiency and can be used in low‐intensity solar areas. Insulated copper tubes consisting of water or air are used to absorb solar energy. Water or air present in the tubes is heated up before returning to the storage system (Kannan and Vakeesan 2016). In a modification evacuated tube collector is used where heating pipes are shielded by vacuum. This modification is 20–45% more efficient than flat‐plate collectors (Mangal et al. 2010).

      2.3.1.2 Solar Power Generation

      For electrical and mechanical connections, a solar power generation plant has many parts, namely arrays and modules of solar cells and means of controlling systems. Immense research is done in the area of power generation using solar energy at the practical level to evaluate the efficiency, lifespan, cost and durability of such power plants or even small‐scale grid systems. For the fulfilment of energy demand of people, use of hybrid power systems (Parida et al. 2011) is suggested where PV panels cannot generate regular electricity for consumption. In hybrid systems, PV systems are combined with hydro or wind turbines and sometimes with diesel or petrol‐driven generators for uninterrupted power supply. This hybrid system reduces the usage of fossil fuels.

      For power generation using solar energy, different combinations are evaluated from time to time such as hybrid wind/PV or fuel cell power generation systems, wind/PV/battery system and wind/PV/fuel cell electrolyser system. In one of the studies researchers have developed a system by combining