Ziad Al-Ani

Practical Procedures in Dental Occlusion


Скачать книгу

chapter will illustrate the principles of management of non‐carious tooth surface loss (TSL) cases and will focus on:

       achieving an appropriate OVD (when and how)

       review of mounted study casts

       diagnostic wax‐up

       Dahl concept.

      Chapter 16 – All My Teeth Are Restored But Don't Meet Like They Did Before

      In this chapter, a patient has presented with a restored mouth with multiple crowns and they feel the teeth do not meet like before. They cannot find a comfortable position. The use of material that allows testing the increase of OVD when managing advanced restorative care cases will be discussed. A full description of clinical procedure will be offered here.

      Chapter 17 – I Am Breaking My Teeth and Veneers and Lost a Tooth Due To Grinding

      The following points are discussed in this chapter:

       OVD increase

       improving incisal and occlusal relationships

       rule of thirds

       aesthetic and functional analysis.

      Chapter 18 – Occlusion on Implants. Any difference?

      Dental implants may be more prone to occlusal overloading. A primary cause of peri‐implantitis and bone loss around implants is the excessive force applied from unwanted occlusal contact. The occlusal prescription of an implant‐supported restoration, therefore, has to be much more carefully designed than that on a natural tooth. The 10 principles of occlusion over implants are discussed in this chapter.

      Glossary of Terms

      This is more of a dictionary of terms than merely a glossary of terms used in this book. This chapter isolates the relevant terms from the glossary of prosthodontic terms. published regularly in the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.

      Short Answer Questions

      This chapter includes short answer questions for the reader to practise. The knowledge gained from reading this book will enable the reader to answer these questions effectively.

      It is important we address terminology right at the start to reduce the confusion that has been created throughout the history of occlusion. As a source, we will use the Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms (GTP) (2017) edition for the most part.

      The three most important terms are defined below.

      Centric occlusion (CO) – the occlusion of opposing teeth when the mandible is in centric relation (CR); this may or may not coincide with the maximal intercuspal position (MICP) (GTP 2017). Throughout the literature (Jiménez‐Silva et al. 2017, McNamara et al. 1995, Shildkraut et al. 1994, Weffort and de Fantini 2010), centric occlusion is also known as intercuspal or MICP and hence the confusion because the same term can indicate two different positions. So, to prevent further confusion, we will state that centric occlusion is MICP.

      Centric relation – this position has five main points:

      1 a maxillomandibular relationship, independent of tooth contact

      2 the condyles articulate in the anterior–superior position against the posterior slopes of the articular eminences

      3 the mandible is restricted to a purely rotary movement

      4 from this unstrained, physiological, maxillomandibular relationship, the patient can make vertical, lateral, or protrusive movements

      5 it is a clinically useful, repeatable reference position.

      Each statement can be debated and to achieve consensus may be difficult, but the key point is that this is a tooth‐independent position, i.e. it can be recorded in edentulous patients. We feel that first statement is incomplete, and would add: a maxillomandibular relationship, independent of tooth contact at the correct occlusal vertical dimension (OVD) for that individual.

      Centric relation contact position (CRCP) – the occlusion of opposing teeth when the mandible is in centric relation; this may or may not coincide with the MICP (GTP 2017). This may involve one pair of teeth or several pairs or may coincide with all the teeth meeting. When the teeth touch then they slide from that position into MICP. According to Posselt (1952), 90% of the population have a discrepancy between both positions.

Term Other names in the literature Terms we will use in the book
Centric occlusion Maximal intercuspal position, intercuspal position Centric occlusion (CO)/intercuspal position (ICP)/maximal intercuspal position (MICP)
Centric relation Terminal hinge axis or retruded axis position Centric relation (CR)
Centric relation contact position (CRCP) Retruded contact position, centric occlusion Centric relation contact position (CRCP)
Maximal intercuspal position Centric occlusion, intercuspal position, habitual occlusion, bite of convenience Centric occlusion (CO)/intercuspal position (ICP)
Occlusal vertical dimension (OVD) Vertical dimension of occlusion (VDO), dimension of vertical occlusion (DVO) Occlusal vertical dimension (OVD)
Rest vertical dimension (RVD) Rest position, physiological rest position, vertical dimension of rest Rest vertical dimension (RVD)
Freeway space Interocclusal distance Interocclusal distance
Bennett angle Progressive side shift Bennett angle
Bennett shift (movement) Immediate side shift Bennett shift (movement)
Working side movement Laterotrusive, laterotrusion Working side movement
Non‐working side movement Mediotrusive, Mediotrusion Non‐working side movement

      1 (2017). The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms: ninth edition. J. Prosthet. Dent. 117: e1–e105.

      2 Jiménez‐Silva, A., Tobar‐Reyes, J., Vivanco‐Coke, S. et al. (2017). Centric relation–intercuspal position discrepancy and its relationship with temporomandibular disorders. A systematic review. Acta Odontol. Scand. 75 (7): 463–474.

      3 McNamara,