Группа авторов

Diatom Morphogenesis


Скачать книгу

5.15695 -383.425 3354.2 Aulacodiscus oregonus PoiDumjx600www 5.1158 -424.086 4033.01 Coscinodiscus sp. MisBayhx500 5.00421 -465.124 3277.96 Cyclotella meneghiniana + SClemtbx1800 5.09775 -422.176 2448.34

      * All taxa are external valves unless otherwise noted.

      + Symmetry value is the average of all rotations test results.

      The results for external valves was somewhat different from those for all valves combined. Average symmetry per taxon revealed that most of the triangular taxa or those with three-part valve features were the least symmetric in contrast to the most symmetric taxa, including species from Aulacodiscus, taxa with four-part valve features or shape, Glyphodiscus stellatus, Eupodiscus radiatus, Amphitetras antediluviana, and Triceratium pentacrinus fo. quadrata). Actinoptychus senarius, Spatangidium arachne, Asterolampra marylandica, Arachnoidiscus ehrenbergii, and Arachnoidiscus ornatus were notable exceptions to the four-part rule in the highly symmetric group (Figure 2.13). As expected, species of Asteromphalus were nearer in symmetry to Asterolampra grevillei and less symmetric than Asterolampra marylandica. Although, fewer taxa were analyzed with respect to forming valves, a similar result emerged when compared to external valves. Four-part valve or greater featured or shaped taxa were the most symmetric (Figure 2.14). Taxa with higher forming than external valve symmetry were Triceratium favus and Triceratium pentacrinus fo. quadrata (Figure 2.14). Different species of Asteromphalus forming valves were found to be similar in symmetry to those of Asterolampra marylandica, contrary to the situation with external valves.

      Figure 2.23 Valve formation simulation comparison of symmetry and chaotic instability. See Table 2.2 for numerical values.

Schematic illustration of valve formation simulation comparison of symmetry and random instability.

      Figure 2.24 Valve formation simulation comparison of symmetry and random instability. See Table 2.2 for numerical values.

      Normal and abnormal valves for Cyclotella meneghiniana were compared in terms of symmetry (Figure 2.16). Normal valves had a steeper slope than abnormal valves, indicating a greater change in symmetry. That is, abnormal valves have less symmetry or greater asymmetry than normal valves of Cyclotella meneghiniana.

      Initial valves were compared to normal vegetative valves of Cyclotella meneghiniana. The average symmetry of the initial valves was much higher than average symmetry for external and forming vegetative valves (Figure 2.17). The difference in symmetry of the central area was the key to the difference between initial and vegetative valves. The undulated central area of the vegetative valve has less symmetry than the symmetry of the more uniform convex shape in initial valves.

      In the valve formation simulation, least symmetric taxa ranged from Actinoptychus splendens to the highest symmetric taxon, Actinoptychus senarius (Figures 2.23 and 2.24). The more distinct and regular the valve surfaces features were present, the more symmetric was the taxon. Less symmetric taxa had the highest chaotic and random instability (Figures 2.23 and 2.24). This relation between asymmetry and instability is supported for other organisms [2.54]. The main difference in our analysis is that the sources of instability are different for different degrees of symmetry.

      2.4.1 Symmetry and Scale in Diatoms

      Nano-, micro-, or macro-scale dependent symmetry may be evident as individual or groups of structural features that may not have the same symmetry at the same time (Figure 2.3). Concomitantly, these different kinds of symmetry are measurable implicitly at multiple scales. By isolating sections of the valve face in terms of micro or nanostructure, each kind of symmetry can be measured. Scale dependency occurs if a valve formation sequence is not monotonic or linear. For example, centric diatom symmetry in Cyclotella meneghiniana may be an example of scale dependency (Figure 2.19). In some cases, scale symmetry as scale invariance may be present (Figure 2.3k). Pattern repetition at multiple scales and fractal scaling may be determined by testing for the Hausdorff dimension [2.29].

      2.4.2 Valve Formation and Stability

      We modeled our diatom morphogenetic valve formation system as dynamical and in equilibrium in order to test for stability behavior as it is associated to symmetry. Uncanny symmetry as a measure was useful in determining the degree of stability in valve formation. We determined that valve formation simulation proceeded primarily as deterministic chaotic instability mixed with lesser periods of stability. While instability may look like randomness, we found that for our simulation of valve morphogenesis, accretionary behavior is essentially chaotic. Valve formation PDF depicted a gamma distribution with a stretched exponential tail (Figure 2.20), potentially indicating intermittency in this dynamical system [2.115], provided that as time approaches infinity, the Lyapunov exponent is equal to zero [2.74].

      Stability analysis in the form of Lyapunov systems provided a way to assess the sources of instability with regard to valve formation in diatom morphogenesis. Finding a deterministic