C. Anandharamakrishnan

3D Printing of Foods


Скачать книгу

and lard interlayers."/>

      Source: From Dick et al. (2019), Figure 03 [p. 13] / With permission of Elsevier. DOI‐https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.02.024.

      Only a few studies were reported on revealing the complexity involved in the 3D printing of fibres. Lille et al. (2018) conducted a study on correlating the material supply for the development of novel 3D structures with a food formula rich in fibre and protein with reduced‐fat and sugars. The ingredients of the printing mixture composed of starch, nanocellulose fibres and milk powder. These ingredients were tested individually as well as in combination for obtaining stable 3D structures after printing. Considering the printability of fibres, the gel matrix was reinforced with cellulose nanofibers (CNF). Printing of fibres showed that there was a discontinuous material flow of the CNF gel system that seems to block the printing nozzle due to its larger fibre particles, causing phase separation and material flocculation (Lille et al. 2018). This study provides a comparative assessment of ingredients and showed that 3D printing of fibres was quite difficult than that of starch and protein‐based food systems. Further, the study highlights a key challenge associated with the printing of fibre‐rich food systems providing an overall idea of the applicability of diverse food materials for 3D printing.

Photos depict the effect of particle size on 3D printing of fibrous spinach powder (a) 307 μm, (b) 259 μm, (c) 172 μm, (d) 50 μm.

      Source: From Lee et al. (2019), Figure 03 [p. 05] / With permission of Elsevier. DOI‐https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2019.03.014.