customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?
<--- Score
62. Looking at each person individually – does every one have the qualities which are needed to work in this group?
<--- Score
63. Do you have/need 24-hour access to key personnel?
<--- Score
64. What are the expected benefits of Training Evaluation to the stakeholder?
<--- Score
65. What should be considered when identifying available resources, constraints, and deadlines?
<--- Score
66. What else needs to be measured?
<--- Score
67. What are the stakeholder objectives to be achieved with Training Evaluation?
<--- Score
68. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in Training Evaluation? In other words, what are the risks, if Training Evaluation does not deliver successfully?
<--- Score
69. What training and capacity building actions are needed to implement proposed reforms?
<--- Score
70. What prevents you from making the changes you know will make you a more effective Training Evaluation leader?
<--- Score
71. For your Training Evaluation project, identify and describe the business environment, is there more than one layer to the business environment?
<--- Score
72. Consider your own Training Evaluation project, what types of organizational problems do you think might be causing or affecting your problem, based on the work done so far?
<--- Score
73. How did the assessment identify the design features to include and to avoid?
<--- Score
74. Do you need different information or graphics?
<--- Score
75. Are employees recognized for desired behaviors?
<--- Score
76. Do you need to avoid or amend any Training Evaluation activities?
<--- Score
77. Why is this needed?
<--- Score
78. Are losses recognized in a timely manner?
<--- Score
79. To what extent would your organization benefit from being recognized as a award recipient?
<--- Score
80. Can management personnel recognize the monetary benefit of Training Evaluation?
<--- Score
81. How do you assess your Training Evaluation workforce capability and capacity needs, including skills, competencies, and staffing levels?
<--- Score
82. Are your goals realistic? Do you need to redefine your problem? Perhaps the problem has changed or maybe you have reached your goal and need to set a new one?
<--- Score
83. Are there any specific expectations or concerns about the Training Evaluation team, Training Evaluation itself?
<--- Score
84. Do you recognize Training Evaluation achievements?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Training Evaluation Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
2. How do you gather Training Evaluation requirements?
<--- Score
3. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Training Evaluation leverage and how?
<--- Score
4. Has a Training Evaluation requirement not been met?
<--- Score
5. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
6. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
7. Is Training Evaluation currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
8. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
9. What gets examined?
<--- Score
10. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
11. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
12. Who is gathering Training Evaluation information?
<--- Score
13. Who are the Training Evaluation improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
14. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
15. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
16. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
17. Do you have a Training Evaluation success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
18. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
19. What is the context?
<--- Score
20. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
21. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
22. How did the Training Evaluation manager receive input to the development of a Training Evaluation improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
23. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
24.