Gerardus Blokdyk

Training Evaluation A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition


Скачать книгу

requirements?

      <--- Score

      80. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      81. What are the Training Evaluation tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      82. How does the Training Evaluation manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      83. What happens if Training Evaluation’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      84. Are the Training Evaluation requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      85. What Training Evaluation requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      86. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      87. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      88. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      89. How would you define Training Evaluation leadership?

      <--- Score

      90. Has the Training Evaluation work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      91. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      92. What Training Evaluation services do you require?

      <--- Score

      93. Will team members regularly document their Training Evaluation work?

      <--- Score

      94. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      95. What is the scope of the Training Evaluation work?

      <--- Score

      96. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      97. What are the record-keeping requirements of Training Evaluation activities?

      <--- Score

      98. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      99. Is the Training Evaluation scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      100. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      101. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      102. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      103. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Training Evaluation goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      104. How will the Training Evaluation team and the group measure complete success of Training Evaluation?

      <--- Score

      105. Are customers identified and high impact areas defined?

      <--- Score

      106. What is the scope of the Training Evaluation effort?

      <--- Score

      107. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Training Evaluation changes?

      <--- Score

      108. What sources do you use to gather information for a Training Evaluation study?

      <--- Score

      109. How do you manage unclear Training Evaluation requirements?

      <--- Score

      110. Is there a Training Evaluation management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

      <--- Score

      111. How have you defined all Training Evaluation requirements first?

      <--- Score

      112. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      113. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      114. What are (control) requirements for Training Evaluation Information?

      <--- Score

      115. Is Training Evaluation required?

      <--- Score

      116. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      117. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Training Evaluation?

      <--- Score

      118. Do you all define Training Evaluation in the same way?

      <--- Score

      119. Is Training Evaluation linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      120. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      121. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      122. Is there a clear Training Evaluation case definition?

      <--- Score

      123. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Training Evaluation brings?

      <--- Score

      124. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      125. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      126. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      127. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      128. What is the scope of Training Evaluation?

      <--- Score

      129. When is/was the Training Evaluation start date?

      <--- Score

      130. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      131. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      132. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      133. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      134. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      135. What knowledge