testable?
<--- Score
75. Is the ELK stack scope manageable?
<--- Score
76. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
77. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
78. What was the context?
<--- Score
79. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the ELK stack goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
80. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
81. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
82. What is the scope of ELK stack?
<--- Score
83. What is the scope of the ELK stack effort?
<--- Score
84. Do you all define ELK stack in the same way?
<--- Score
85. Is there a ELK stack management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
86. Is the scope of ELK stack defined?
<--- Score
87. How will the ELK stack team and the group measure complete success of ELK stack?
<--- Score
88. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
89. What is in scope?
<--- Score
90. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
91. What are the ELK stack tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
92. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
93. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
94. When is/was the ELK stack start date?
<--- Score
95. What is the context?
<--- Score
96. What ELK stack services do you require?
<--- Score
97. Has a ELK stack requirement not been met?
<--- Score
98. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
99. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
100. How are consistent ELK stack definitions important?
<--- Score
101. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
102. How do you hand over ELK stack context?
<--- Score
103. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
104. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
105. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected ELK stack results are met?
<--- Score
106. Are accountability and ownership for ELK stack clearly defined?
<--- Score
107. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
108. Who is gathering ELK stack information?
<--- Score
109. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
110. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
111. How did the ELK stack manager receive input to the development of a ELK stack improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
112. How do you manage unclear ELK stack requirements?
<--- Score
113. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
114. What is the scope?
<--- Score
115. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on ELK stack?
<--- Score
116. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does ELK stack leverage and how?
<--- Score
117. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
118. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
119. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
120. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
121. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
122. Have all basic functions of ELK stack been defined?
<--- Score
123. What gets examined?
<--- Score
124. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
125. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
126. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that ELK stack brings?
<--- Score
127. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
128. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
129. How would you define ELK stack leadership?
<--- Score
130. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
131. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired