Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?
<--- Score
61. What vendors make products that address the Management ethics needs?
<--- Score
62. When a Management ethics manager recognizes a problem, what options are available?
<--- Score
63. What are the clients issues and concerns?
<--- Score
64. As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?
<--- Score
65. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in Management ethics? In other words, what are the risks, if Management ethics does not deliver successfully?
<--- Score
66. How do you recognize an Management ethics objection?
<--- Score
67. Are there regulatory / compliance issues?
<--- Score
68. What problems are you facing and how do you consider Management ethics will circumvent those obstacles?
<--- Score
69. To what extent would your organization benefit from being recognized as a award recipient?
<--- Score
70. How do you assess your Management ethics workforce capability and capacity needs, including skills, competencies, and staffing levels?
<--- Score
71. What activities does the governance board need to consider?
<--- Score
72. Which issues are too important to ignore?
<--- Score
73. What are the minority interests and what amount of minority interests can be recognized?
<--- Score
74. What information do users need?
<--- Score
75. What is the problem or issue?
<--- Score
76. Who needs budgets?
<--- Score
77. What needs to stay?
<--- Score
78. Why the need?
<--- Score
79. How can auditing be a preventative security measure?
<--- Score
80. Is the need for organizational change recognized?
<--- Score
81. How do you identify subcontractor relationships?
<--- Score
82. How are the Management ethics’s objectives aligned to the group’s overall stakeholder strategy?
<--- Score
83. Are employees recognized for desired behaviors?
<--- Score
84. Is the quality assurance team identified?
<--- Score
85. Looking at each person individually – does every one have the qualities which are needed to work in this group?
<--- Score
86. Is it needed?
<--- Score
87. Do you need different information or graphics?
<--- Score
88. Would you recognize a threat from the inside?
<--- Score
89. Will a response program recognize when a crisis occurs and provide some level of response?
<--- Score
90. Will Management ethics deliverables need to be tested and, if so, by whom?
<--- Score
91. Who needs what information?
<--- Score
92. What prevents you from making the changes you know will make you a more effective Management ethics leader?
<--- Score
93. Who should resolve the Management ethics issues?
<--- Score
94. What is the recognized need?
<--- Score
95. Are there recognized Management ethics problems?
<--- Score
96. What is the smallest subset of the problem you can usefully solve?
<--- Score
97. Does Management ethics create potential expectations in other areas that need to be recognized and considered?
<--- Score
98. Are you dealing with any of the same issues today as yesterday? What can you do about this?
<--- Score
99. Are there any specific expectations or concerns about the Management ethics team, Management ethics itself?
<--- Score
100. Do you need to avoid or amend any Management ethics activities?
<--- Score
101. What are your needs in relation to Management ethics skills, labor, equipment, and markets?
<--- Score
102. What Management ethics capabilities do you need?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Management ethics Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What are the Management ethics tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
2. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
3. What was the context?
<--- Score
4. Is Management ethics required?
<--- Score
5. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
6. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
7. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
8. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score