issues?
<--- Score
62. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?
<--- Score
63. What activities does the governance board need to consider?
<--- Score
64. What else needs to be measured?
<--- Score
65. What are the Social recession resources needed?
<--- Score
66. What problems are you facing and how do you consider Social recession will circumvent those obstacles?
<--- Score
67. Does your organization need more Social recession education?
<--- Score
68. What extra resources will you need?
<--- Score
69. Are problem definition and motivation clearly presented?
<--- Score
70. Which issues are too important to ignore?
<--- Score
71. How can auditing be a preventative security measure?
<--- Score
72. What needs to be done?
<--- Score
73. How do you assess your Social recession workforce capability and capacity needs, including skills, competencies, and staffing levels?
<--- Score
74. What prevents you from making the changes you know will make you a more effective Social recession leader?
<--- Score
75. Are there recognized Social recession problems?
<--- Score
76. What is the Social recession problem definition? What do you need to resolve?
<--- Score
77. What creative shifts do you need to take?
<--- Score
78. How does it fit into your organizational needs and tasks?
<--- Score
79. Do you have/need 24-hour access to key personnel?
<--- Score
80. How do you identify subcontractor relationships?
<--- Score
81. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in Social recession? In other words, what are the risks, if Social recession does not deliver successfully?
<--- Score
82. What does Social recession success mean to the stakeholders?
<--- Score
83. Who needs to know?
<--- Score
84. Are there any specific expectations or concerns about the Social recession team, Social recession itself?
<--- Score
85. Whom do you really need or want to serve?
<--- Score
86. How are the Social recession’s objectives aligned to the group’s overall stakeholder strategy?
<--- Score
87. Is the quality assurance team identified?
<--- Score
88. Will a response program recognize when a crisis occurs and provide some level of response?
<--- Score
89. What are the stakeholder objectives to be achieved with Social recession?
<--- Score
90. Are you dealing with any of the same issues today as yesterday? What can you do about this?
<--- Score
91. As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?
<--- Score
92. Can management personnel recognize the monetary benefit of Social recession?
<--- Score
93. Who should resolve the Social recession issues?
<--- Score
94. What resources or support might you need?
<--- Score
95. Do you need to avoid or amend any Social recession activities?
<--- Score
96. Think about the people you identified for your Social recession project and the project responsibilities you would assign to them, what kind of training do you think they would need to perform these responsibilities effectively?
<--- Score
97. Why the need?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Social recession Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How does the Social recession manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
2. How do you manage unclear Social recession requirements?
<--- Score
3. How do you think the partners involved in Social recession would have defined success?
<--- Score
4. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
5. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
6. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
7. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
8. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
9. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
10. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
11. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
12. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
13. How do you hand over Social recession context?
<---