Gerardus Blokdyk

Human Learning A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition


Скачать книгу

      <--- Score

      15. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      16. Who approved the Human learning scope?

      <--- Score

      17. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      18. What sources do you use to gather information for a Human learning study?

      <--- Score

      19. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      20. What are the record-keeping requirements of Human learning activities?

      <--- Score

      21. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      22. Will team members perform Human learning work when assigned and in a timely fashion?

      <--- Score

      23. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      24. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      25. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      26. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      27. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      28. How would you define Human learning leadership?

      <--- Score

      29. When is/was the Human learning start date?

      <--- Score

      30. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      31. Are improvement team members fully trained on Human learning?

      <--- Score

      32. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Human learning?

      <--- Score

      33. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      34. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      35. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      36. What are the Human learning tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      37. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      38. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      39. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      40. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      41. Are the Human learning requirements complete?

      <--- Score

      42. How did the Human learning manager receive input to the development of a Human learning improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      43. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?

      <--- Score

      44. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      45. How do you catch Human learning definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      46. Is the scope of Human learning defined?

      <--- Score

      47. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Human learning? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      48. How are consistent Human learning definitions important?

      <--- Score

      49. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      50. Who are the Human learning improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      51. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      52. How do you manage unclear Human learning requirements?

      <--- Score

      53. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      54. Is Human learning linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      55. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      56. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      57. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      58. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      59. Is Human learning currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      60. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      61. What is the definition of Human learning excellence?

      <--- Score

      62. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      63. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      64. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      65. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Human learning changes?

      <--- Score

      66. How does the Human learning manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      67. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      68. Is there a clear Human learning case definition?

      <--- Score

      69. How will the Human learning team and the group measure complete success of Human learning?

      <--- Score

      70. What would be the goal or target for a Human learning’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      71. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      72.