not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
114. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
115. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
116. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
117. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
118. What Automated Pain Recognition services do you require?
<--- Score
119. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
120. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
121. How did the Automated Pain Recognition manager receive input to the development of a Automated Pain Recognition improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
122. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
123. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
124. What are (control) requirements for Automated Pain Recognition Information?
<--- Score
125. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
126. Is there any additional Automated Pain Recognition definition of success?
<--- Score
127. Why are you doing Automated Pain Recognition and what is the scope?
<--- Score
128. How can the value of Automated Pain Recognition be defined?
<--- Score
129. How do you gather Automated Pain Recognition requirements?
<--- Score
130. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
131. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
132. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Automated Pain Recognition work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
133. How will the Automated Pain Recognition team and the group measure complete success of Automated Pain Recognition?
<--- Score
134. What are the Automated Pain Recognition tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
135. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
136. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
137. How would you define Automated Pain Recognition leadership?
<--- Score
138. Is the Automated Pain Recognition scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
139. Are the Automated Pain Recognition requirements testable?
<--- Score
140. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
141. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Automated Pain Recognition Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How will success or failure be measured?
<--- Score
2. How can you reduce costs?
<--- Score
3. Does a Automated Pain Recognition quantification method exist?
<--- Score
4. What would it cost to replace your technology?
<--- Score
5. How are costs allocated?
<--- Score
6. What is the root cause(s) of the problem?
<--- Score
7. What drives O&M cost?
<--- Score
8. What are the Automated Pain Recognition investment costs?
<--- Score
9. When should you bother with diagrams?
<--- Score
10. What disadvantage does this cause for the user?
<--- Score
11. Is the solution cost-effective?
<--- Score
12. Who should receive measurement reports?
<--- Score
13. Is there an opportunity to verify requirements?
<--- Score
14. What is your Automated Pain Recognition quality cost segregation study?
<--- Score
15. Are the measurements objective?
<--- Score
16. What could cause you to change course?
<--- Score
17. How can you reduce the costs of obtaining inputs?
<--- Score
18. What are the costs?
<--- Score
19. Are the Automated Pain Recognition benefits worth its costs?
<--- Score
20. How can you manage cost down?
<--- Score
21. Why do the measurements/indicators matter?
<--- Score
22. What are the uncertainties surrounding estimates of impact?
<--- Score
23. How is the value delivered by Automated Pain Recognition being measured?
<--- Score
24.