pursued in packaging applications, it can be still regarded as a remarkable plus, especially in times when oil prices are being increased markedly. However, it is also worthy to note that currently less than 6% of petroleum is addressed to produce polymers in the plastic industry. As a result, the real key property associated with biopolymers from an environmental point of view would be to develop polymers being readily biodegradable. Some plastic parts made of biodegradable polymers can additionally meet the requirements of harmonized standards for compostable materials. Today, a lot of different European and International Standards exist for biodegradable polymer‐based materials (e.g. EN 13432 or ASTM D6400). They are mainly dealing with natural degradation under specific environmental conditions, particularly for packaging waste.
Looking at the end‐of‐life options for biopolymers, different recovery and disposal paths can coexist. In most countries, no separate collection system for biopolymers is established. In USA and Western Europe, highly developed separate collection systems for packaging waste exist and littering of plastic waste present a minor problem. However, waste disposal represents a serious problem for other countries where the recycling rates are still low and waste management is not properly working. Beside residual waste, the mixed plastic fraction from waste sorting can be supplied to waste incineration. During quaternary recycling, the resulting steam can be used in energy production, heating, and solid recovered fuel production. Secondary (mechanical) and, even, tertiary (chemical) recycling of biopolymers, particularly relevant if they are not biodegradable, is also possible. However, these processes would first require appropriate separate collection systems, which are difficult as biopolymers are still present in minor amounts and a wide range of bioplastics and their blends coexist on the market. At this moment, the mechanical recycling of biopolymers is at its beginning and the market penetration is not high enough to make recycling of biopolymers profitable. Furthermore, modern recycling processes, which are state of the art for commercial polymers, will have to be adapted to handle bioplastics properly. For instance, owners of recycling plants should make an effort to ensure that no mixed PLA‐ and PET‐fractions are getting into bottle‐to‐bottle recycling.
Biodegradable packaging is expected to solve the solid waste problem as well as the litter problem. Nevertheless, the current situation indicates that only a few cities are able to collect and compost green waste. Converting a solid material to a gas via biodegradation or composting could not be sustainable if the collecting system is not prepared. In such cases, it is much better to recycle or recover the embodied energy through incineration. Therefore, there is a need to close the resource loop and make the most out of the material rather than simply use it once. Composting, both industrial or home types, is the expected option for biodegradable polymer-based packaging in a near future. This should be considered after material recycling and before thermal utilization. The production of humus‐rich compost from different organic waste is a kind of material use. However, home composting rarely leads to success in terms of complete decomposition in an adequate period of time. Most of the biodegradable polymers are only usable for industrial composting. Nonbiodegradable biopolymers in addition to conventional fossil derived polymers can have a negative impact on the composting process. Additionally, owners of composting plants are not always pleased with the development and introduction of compostable articles either. In recent years, some labeling for compostable packaging materials has been developed, though they do not necessarily give information about the renewable material content.
Overall, although promising steps have been done in the area of biopolymers and new law regulations are pushing toward the use of such materials, more advances need to be carry not only to enhance material performance but also in terms of market possibilities. Current bioplastics should be in a near future more cost‐effective, easier to process, and with enhanced performance so that food packaging users will fully benefit from their use and also, in terms of policy regulations, the use of such materials can be standardized in the food packaging industry.
References
1 1 FAO (2019). The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
2 2 Ahvenainen, R. (2003). Novel Food Packaging Techniques. Woodhead Publishing.
3 3 Torres‐Giner, S., Gil, L., Pascual‐Ramírez, L., and Garde‐Belza, J.A. (2018). Packaging: food waste reduction. Encyclopedia of Polymer Applications 3: 1990–2009.
4 4 Majid, I., Ahmad Nayik, G., Mohammad Dar, S., and Nanda, V. (2018). Novel food packaging technologies: innovations and future prospective. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences 17 (4): 454–462.
5 5 Jabeen, N., Majid, I., and Nayik, G.A. (2015). Bioplastics and food packaging: a review. Cogent Food & Agriculture 1 (1): 1117749.
6 6 Williams, C.K. and Hillmyer, M.A. (2008). Polymers from renewable resources: a perspective for a special issue of polymer reviews. Polymer Reviews 48 (1): 1–10.
7 7 Xie, Y., Kohls, D., Noda, I. et al. (2009). Poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyhexanoate) nanocomposites with optimal mechanical properties. Polymer 50 (19): 4656–4670.
8 8 Payne, J., McKeown, P., and Jones, M.D. (2019). A circular economy approach to plastic waste. Polymer Degradation and Stability 165: 170–181.
9 9 Tharanathan, R.N. (2003). Biodegradable films and composite coatings: past, present and future. Trends in Food Science & Technology 14 (3): 71–78.
10 10 Ashter, S.A. (ed.) (2016). In Plastics Design Library, Introduction to Bioplastics Engineering, 81–151. William Andrew Publishing.
11 11 Laycock, B., Nikolić, M., Colwell, J.M. et al. (2017). Lifetime prediction of biodegradable polymers. Progress in Polymer Science 71: 144–189.
12 12 Thakur, S., Chaudhary, J., Sharma, B. et al. (2018). Sustainability of bioplastics: opportunities and challenges. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry 13: 68–75.
13 13 Tsang, Y.F., Kumar, V., Samadar, P. et al. (2019). Production of bioplastic through food waste valorization. Environment International 127: 625–644.
14 14 Balan, V. (2014). Current challenges in commercially producing biofuels from lignocellulosic biomass. ISRN Biotechnology 2014: 463074–463074.
15 15 Braunegg, G., Lefebvre, G., and Genser, K.F. (1998). Polyhydroxyalkanoates, biopolyesters from renewable resources: physiological and engineering aspects. Journal of Biotechnology 65 (2): 127–161.
16 16 Cui, S., Borgemenke, J., Liu, Z., and Li, Y. (2019). Recent advances of “soft” bio‐polycarbonate plastics from carbon dioxide and renewable bio‐feedstocks via straightforward and innovative routes. Journal of CO2 Utilization 34: 40–52.
17 17 Höfer, R. and Selig, M. (2012). Green chemistry and green. Polymer Chemistry 10: 5–13.
18 18 Hatti‐Kaul, R., Nilsson, L.J., Zhang, B. et al. (2019). Designing biobased recyclable polymers for plastics. Trends in Biotechnology 38: 50–67.
19 19 Sorrentino, A., Gorrasi, G., and Vittoria, V. (2007). Potential perspectives of bio‐nanocomposites for food packaging applications. Trends in Food Science and Technology 18 (2): 84–95.
20 20 Rhim, J.‐W., Park, H.‐M., and Ha, C.‐S. (2013). Bio‐nanocomposites for food packaging applications. Progress in Polymer Science 38 (10): 1629–1652.
21 21 Vink, E.T.H., Glassner, D.A., Kolstad, J.J. et al. (2007). The eco‐profiles for current and near‐future NatureWorks® polylactide (PLA) production. Industrial Biotechnology 3 (1): 58–81.
22 22 Vroman, I. and Tighzert, L. (2009). Biodegradable polymers. Materials 2 (2): 307–344.
23 23 Schué, F. (2000). Biopolymers from renewable resources. Edited by D.L. Kaplan Springer‐Verlag, Heidelberg, 1998. Pp 417, Price DM278.00 ISBN 3‐540‐63567‐X. Polymer International 49 (5): 472–473.
24 24 Auras, R., Harte, B., and Selke, S. (2004). An overview of polylactides as packaging materials. Macromolecular Bioscience 4 (9): 835–864.
25 25 Jamshidian, M., Tehrany, E.A., Imran, M. et al. (2010). Poly‐lactic acid: production, applications, nanocomposites,