Группа авторов

The Handbook of Language and Speech Disorders


Скачать книгу

status? Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 6, 233–242.

      32 Cacace, A. T., & McFarland, D. J. (1998). Central auditory processing disorder in school‐aged children: A critical review. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 41, 355–373.

      33 Carroll, J. B. (1997). Psychometrics, intelligence, and public perception. Intelligence, 24, 25–52.

      34 Chakrabarti, S., & Fombonne, E. (2001). Pervasive developmental disorders in preschool children. Journal of American Medical Association, 285, 3093–3099.

      35 Cherkes‐Julkowski, M., Sharp, S., & Stolzenberg, J.. (Eds.) (1997). Rethinking attention deficit disorders. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.

      36 Cole, K., Schwartz, I., Notari, A., Dale, P., & Mills, P. (1995). Examination of the stability of two measures of defining specific language impairment. Applied PsychoLinguistics, 16, 103–123.

      37 Coles, G. (1987). The learning mystique: A critical look at “learning disabilities”. New York, NY: Pantheon.

      38 Connor, D. (2006). Michael’s story: “I get into so much trouble just by walking”: Narrative knowing and life at the intersections of learning disability, race, and class. Equity & Excellence in Education, 39(2), 154–165.

      39 Connor, D. J., & Ferri, B. A. (2005). Integration and inclusion: A troubling nexus: Race, disability, and special education. The Journal of African American History, 90(1/2), 107–127.

      40 Conrad, P. (1976). Identifying hyperactive children: The medicalization of deviant behavior. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.

      41 Conrad, P. (1992). Medicalization and social control. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 209–232.

      42 Conrad, P. (2000). Medicalization, genetics, and human problems. In C. Bird, P. Conrad, & A. Fremont (Eds.), The handbook of medical sociology (pp. 322–333). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

      43 Conrad, P. (2007). The medicalization of society. On the transformation of human conditions into treatable disorders. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

      44 Conrad, P. (2009). The shifting engines of medicalization. In P. Conrad (Ed.), The sociology of health & illness. Critical perspectives (pp. 480–492). New York, NY: Worth Publishers.

      45 Conrad, P., & Potter, D. (2000). From hyperactive children to ADHD adults: Observations on the expansion of medical categories. Social Problems, 47(4), 559–582.

      46 Conti‐Ramsden, G., Crutchley, A., & Botting, N. (1999). Classification of children with specific language impairment: Longitudinal considerations. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 1195–1204.

      47 Cooksey, E., & Brown, P. (1998). Spinning on its axes: DSM and the social construction of psychiatric diagnosis. International Journal of Health Services, 28, 525–554.

      48 Cronbach, L. J. (1988). Five perspectives on validity argument. In H. Weiner & H. Braun (Eds.), Test validity (pp. 3–17). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

      49 Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

      50 Damico, J. S. (1991). Descriptive assessment of communicative ability in limited English proficient students. In E. V. Hamayan & J. S. Damico (Eds.), Limiting bias in the assessment of bilingual students (pp. 157–218). Austin, TX: Pro‐Ed.

      51 Damico, J. S. (2019). Anchored assessment. In J. S. Damico & M. J. Ball (Eds.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of human communicative sciences and disorders (pp. 135–139). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

      52 Damico, J. S., & Augustine, L. E. (1995). Social considerations in the labeling of students as attention deficit hyperactivity disordered. Seminars in Speech and Language, 16, 259–274.

      53 Damico, J. S., Müller, N., & Ball, M. J. (2004). Owning up to complexity: A sociocultural orientation to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Seminars in Speech and Language, 25, 277–285.

      54 Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

      55 Darley, F. L. (1975). Aphasia without adjectives. In F. L. Darley (Ed.), Aphasia (pp. 1–54). Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.

      56 Deyhle, D. (1987). Learning failure: Tests as gatekeepers and the culturally different child. In H. T. Trueba (Ed.), Success or failure? Learning and the language minority student (pp. 85–108). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.

      57 Department of Education. (2002). Twenty‐fourth Annual Report to Congress on the Implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education.

      58 Dollaghan, C. (2004). Taxometric analysis of specific language impairment in 3‐ and 4‐year old children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 464–475.

      59 Duchan, J. (2010). An open letter to the journal. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 1, 157–164.

      60 Dudley‐Marling, C., & Dippo, D. (1995). What learning disabilities does: Sustaining the ideology of schooling. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 408–414.

      61 Edwards, S., & Bastiaanse, R. (2007). Assessment of aphasia in a multi‐lingual world. In M. J. Ball & J. S. Damico (Eds.), Clinical aphasiology. Future directions (pp. 245–258). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

      62 Elliott, J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2014). The dyslexia debate. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

      63 Erchak, G. M., & Rosenfeld, R. (1989). Learning disabilities, dyslexia, and the medicalization of the classroom. In J. Best (Ed.), Images of issues (pp. 79–97). New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

      64 Erikson, K. T. (1962). Notes on the sociology of deviance. Social Problems, 9, 307–314.

      65 Erikson, K. T. (1966). Wayward puritans. New York, NY: Wiley.

      66 Fairbanks, C. M. (1992). Labels, literacy, and enabling learning: Glenn’s story. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 475–493.

      67 Fine, M. (1991). Framing dropouts: Notes on the politics of an urban public high school. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

      68 Flower, R. M. (1984). Delivery of speech‐language and audiology services. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.

      69 Fombonne, E. (2003). Epidemiological surveys of autism and other pervasive developmental disorders: An update. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33, 365–382.

      70 Forness, S. R. (1976). Behavioristic orientation to categorical labels. Journal of School Psychology, 14, 90–95.

      71 Fox, P. (1989). From senility to Alzheimer’s disease: The rise of the Alzheimer’s movement. Milbank Quarterly, 67, 58–102.

      72 Fraser, L., & Christopher, B. (2007). Is the use of labels in special education helpful? Support for Learning, 22, 36–42.

      73 Frattura, E., & Capper, C. A. (2006). Segregated programs versus integrated comprehensive service delivery for all learners: Assessing the differences. Remedial and Special Education, 27(6), 355–364.

      74 Gelb, S. A., & Mizokawa, D. T. (1986). Special education and social structure: The commonality of “exceptionality”. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 543–557.

      75 Gergen, K. J., & Davis, K. E. (Eds.) (1985). The social construction of the person. New York, NY: Springer.

      76 Gernsbacher, M. A., Dawson, M., & Goldsmith, H. H. (2005). Three reasons not to believe in an autism epidemic. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(2), 55–58.

      77 Gibbs, S., & Elliott, J. (2015). The differential effects of labelling: How do ‘dyslexia’ and ‘reading difficulties’ affect teachers’ beliefs. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 30, 323–337.

      78 Gill, V. T., & Maynard, D. W. (1995). On “Labeling” in actual interaction: Delivering and receiving diagnoses of developmental disabilities. Social