CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. For your Field applications engineering project, identify and describe the business environment, is there more than one layer to the business environment?
<--- Score
2. Which information does the Field applications engineering business case need to include?
<--- Score
3. Can management personnel recognize the monetary benefit of Field applications engineering?
<--- Score
4. Who are your key stakeholders who need to sign off?
<--- Score
5. Consider your own Field applications engineering project, what types of organizational problems do you think might be causing or affecting your problem, based on the work done so far?
<--- Score
6. What is the problem and/or vulnerability?
<--- Score
7. Did you miss any major Field applications engineering issues?
<--- Score
8. How many trainings, in total, are needed?
<--- Score
9. How do you identify the kinds of information that you will need?
<--- Score
10. What should be considered when identifying available resources, constraints, and deadlines?
<--- Score
11. What do employees need in the short term?
<--- Score
12. Who needs budgets?
<--- Score
13. What resources or support might you need?
<--- Score
14. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?
<--- Score
15. What does Field applications engineering success mean to the stakeholders?
<--- Score
16. Why is this needed?
<--- Score
17. Who needs to know about Field applications engineering?
<--- Score
18. What situation(s) led to this Field applications engineering Self Assessment?
<--- Score
19. Do you have/need 24-hour access to key personnel?
<--- Score
20. What are the Field applications engineering resources needed?
<--- Score
21. What Field applications engineering problem should be solved?
<--- Score
22. Do you need to avoid or amend any Field applications engineering activities?
<--- Score
23. How are training requirements identified?
<--- Score
24. Which issues are too important to ignore?
<--- Score
25. What are the clients issues and concerns?
<--- Score
26. Where do you need to exercise leadership?
<--- Score
27. Are there recognized Field applications engineering problems?
<--- Score
28. Think about the people you identified for your Field applications engineering project and the project responsibilities you would assign to them, what kind of training do you think they would need to perform these responsibilities effectively?
<--- Score
29. What would happen if Field applications engineering weren’t done?
<--- Score
30. Is it clear when you think of the day ahead of you what activities and tasks you need to complete?
<--- Score
31. Who else hopes to benefit from it?
<--- Score
32. What else needs to be measured?
<--- Score
33. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Field applications engineering delivery, for example is new software needed?
<--- Score
34. Have you identified your Field applications engineering key performance indicators?
<--- Score
35. Which needs are not included or involved?
<--- Score
36. Do you know what you need to know about Field applications engineering?
<--- Score
37. What needs to stay?
<--- Score
38. What is the extent or complexity of the Field applications engineering problem?
<--- Score
39. What problems are you facing and how do you consider Field applications engineering will circumvent those obstacles?
<--- Score
40. Is it needed?
<--- Score
41. What tools and technologies are needed for a custom Field applications engineering project?
<--- Score
42. Are problem definition and motivation clearly presented?
<--- Score
43. How do you recognize an objection?
<--- Score
44. Would you recognize a threat from the inside?
<--- Score
45. Are losses recognized in a timely manner?
<--- Score
46. To what extent would your organization benefit from being recognized as a award recipient?
<--- Score
47. Whom do you really need or want to serve?
<--- Score
48. What extra resources will you need?
<--- Score
49. How do you identify subcontractor relationships?
<--- Score
50. Does your organization need more Field applications engineering education?
<--- Score
51. Are your goals realistic? Do you need to redefine your problem? Perhaps the problem has changed or maybe you have reached your goal and need to set a new one?
<--- Score
52. Are employees recognized or rewarded for performance