What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
59. How will the Field applications engineering team and the group measure complete success of Field applications engineering?
<--- Score
60. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
61. How have you defined all Field applications engineering requirements first?
<--- Score
62. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
63. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
64. What is the scope?
<--- Score
65. Who approved the Field applications engineering scope?
<--- Score
66. What would be the goal or target for a Field applications engineering’s improvement team?
<--- Score
67. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Field applications engineering brings?
<--- Score
68. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
69. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
70. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
71. How does the Field applications engineering manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
72. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
73. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
74. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
75. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
76. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
77. What gets examined?
<--- Score
78. What was the context?
<--- Score
79. Who is gathering Field applications engineering information?
<--- Score
80. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
81. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
82. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
83. How do you gather Field applications engineering requirements?
<--- Score
84. What are the Field applications engineering use cases?
<--- Score
85. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Field applications engineering? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
86. What system do you use for gathering Field applications engineering information?
<--- Score
87. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
88. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
89. Is special Field applications engineering user knowledge required?
<--- Score
90. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
91. How did the Field applications engineering manager receive input to the development of a Field applications engineering improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
92. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
93. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Field applications engineering?
<--- Score
94. Do you all define Field applications engineering in the same way?
<--- Score
95. What are the Field applications engineering tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
96. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Field applications engineering work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
97. What is the scope of the Field applications engineering work?
<--- Score
98. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
99. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
100. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
101. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Field applications engineering results are met?
<--- Score
102. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
103. Has a Field applications engineering requirement not been met?
<--- Score
104. How are consistent Field applications engineering definitions important?
<--- Score
105. Has the Field applications engineering work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
106. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
107. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
108. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
109. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
110. Is scope