creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
111. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
112. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
113. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
114. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
115. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Field applications engineering goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
116. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
117. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
118. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
119. What are (control) requirements for Field applications engineering Information?
<--- Score
120. How do you manage unclear Field applications engineering requirements?
<--- Score
121. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
122. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
123. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
124. Do you have a Field applications engineering success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
125. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
126. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
127. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
128. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
129. Is the Field applications engineering scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
130. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
131. Is Field applications engineering linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
132. How do you manage changes in Field applications engineering requirements?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Field applications engineering Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What could cause you to change course?
<--- Score
2. Has a cost center been established?
<--- Score
3. What can be used to verify compliance?
<--- Score
4. What does losing customers cost your organization?
<--- Score
5. Are there measurements based on task performance?
<--- Score
6. Do you verify that corrective actions were taken?
<--- Score
7. Do you aggressively reward and promote the people who have the biggest impact on creating excellent Field applications engineering services/products?
<--- Score
8. How will success or failure be measured?
<--- Score
9. Do you have an issue in getting priority?
<--- Score
10. What evidence is there and what is measured?
<--- Score
11. How do you control the overall costs of your work processes?
<--- Score
12. What is the root cause(s) of the problem?
<--- Score
13. Are Field applications engineering vulnerabilities categorized and prioritized?
<--- Score
14. What are the costs of reform?
<--- Score
15. How do you verify and validate the Field applications engineering data?
<--- Score
16. How much does it cost?
<--- Score
17. What does your operating model cost?
<--- Score
18. What measurements are possible, practicable and meaningful?
<--- Score
19. Are supply costs steady or fluctuating?
<--- Score
20. Are there competing Field applications engineering priorities?
<--- Score
21. What is the total fixed cost?
<--- Score
22. What causes mismanagement?
<--- Score
23. How do you measure variability?
<--- Score
24. Is it possible to estimate the impact of unanticipated complexity such as wrong or failed assumptions, feedback, etcetera on proposed reforms?
<--- Score
25. Was a business case (cost/benefit) developed?
<--- Score
26. What are the strategic priorities for this year?
<--- Score
27. What potential environmental factors impact the Field applications engineering effort?
<--- Score
28. How will you measure your Field applications engineering effectiveness?
<--- Score
29. How do you verify your resources?
<--- Score
30. When are costs are incurred?
<--- Score
31. How do you verify the authenticity of the data and information used?
<---