The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
15. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
16. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
17. Has the Regenerative farming work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
18. What are the Regenerative farming tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
19. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
20. Is Regenerative farming linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
21. What is in scope?
<--- Score
22. What happens if Regenerative farming’s scope changes?
<--- Score
23. How will the Regenerative farming team and the group measure complete success of Regenerative farming?
<--- Score
24. What system do you use for gathering Regenerative farming information?
<--- Score
25. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
26. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
27. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
28. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
29. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
30. When is/was the Regenerative farming start date?
<--- Score
31. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
32. What is the scope of Regenerative farming?
<--- Score
33. Has a Regenerative farming requirement not been met?
<--- Score
34. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
35. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
36. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
37. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
38. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
39. How do you gather Regenerative farming requirements?
<--- Score
40. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
41. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
42. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
43. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
44. What is the scope of the Regenerative farming effort?
<--- Score
45. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
46. Do you all define Regenerative farming in the same way?
<--- Score
47. Will a Regenerative farming production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
48. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Regenerative farming results are met?
<--- Score
49. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
50. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
51. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
52. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
53. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
54. Why are you doing Regenerative farming and what is the scope?
<--- Score
55. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
56. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
57. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
58. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
59. What is the scope?
<--- Score
60. What would be the goal or target for a Regenerative farming’s improvement team?
<--- Score
61. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
62. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
63. What is the context?
<--- Score
64. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
65. How can the value of Regenerative farming be defined?
<--- Score
66. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
67. How do you catch Regenerative farming definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
68. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
69. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Regenerative farming work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
70. Are the Regenerative farming requirements testable?
<--- Score
71. Is the Regenerative farming scope complete and