Score
52. Who is involved in verifying compliance?
<--- Score
53. What is your Materials Processing quality cost segregation study?
<--- Score
54. What are the costs of reform?
<--- Score
55. How do you verify Materials Processing completeness and accuracy?
<--- Score
56. What causes investor action?
<--- Score
57. What are allowable costs?
<--- Score
58. What is the root cause(s) of the problem?
<--- Score
59. What measurements are being captured?
<--- Score
60. Are actual costs in line with budgeted costs?
<--- Score
61. Did you tackle the cause or the symptom?
<--- Score
62. Is there an opportunity to verify requirements?
<--- Score
63. How can you reduce costs?
<--- Score
64. What causes innovation to fail or succeed in your organization?
<--- Score
65. Among the Materials Processing product and service cost to be estimated, which is considered hardest to estimate?
<--- Score
66. How will measures be used to manage and adapt?
<--- Score
67. How can you reduce the costs of obtaining inputs?
<--- Score
68. What are your operating costs?
<--- Score
69. How will costs be allocated?
<--- Score
70. Why a Materials Processing focus?
<--- Score
71. How frequently do you track Materials Processing measures?
<--- Score
72. What does your operating model cost?
<--- Score
73. Why do you expend time and effort to implement measurement, for whom?
<--- Score
74. How is performance measured?
<--- Score
75. Where can you go to verify the info?
<--- Score
76. When are costs are incurred?
<--- Score
77. Who should receive measurement reports?
<--- Score
78. Was a business case (cost/benefit) developed?
<--- Score
79. How do you measure lifecycle phases?
<--- Score
80. What measurements are possible, practicable and meaningful?
<--- Score
81. What disadvantage does this cause for the user?
<--- Score
82. Are indirect costs charged to the Materials Processing program?
<--- Score
83. What happens if cost savings do not materialize?
<--- Score
84. Do you have a flow diagram of what happens?
<--- Score
85. How do you measure variability?
<--- Score
86. What can be used to verify compliance?
<--- Score
87. How do you verify the Materials Processing requirements quality?
<--- Score
88. Do you verify that corrective actions were taken?
<--- Score
89. What are the costs of delaying Materials Processing action?
<--- Score
90. How do your measurements capture actionable Materials Processing information for use in exceeding your customers expectations and securing your customers engagement?
<--- Score
91. How do you verify and validate the Materials Processing data?
<--- Score
92. Are there any easy-to-implement alternatives to Materials Processing? Sometimes other solutions are available that do not require the cost implications of a full-blown project?
<--- Score
93. What would be a real cause for concern?
<--- Score
94. How do you focus on what is right -not who is right?
<--- Score
95. Does the Materials Processing task fit the client’s priorities?
<--- Score
96. What is the cause of any Materials Processing gaps?
<--- Score
97. Will Materials Processing have an impact on current business continuity, disaster recovery processes and/or infrastructure?
<--- Score
98. How do you verify performance?
<--- Score
99. How to cause the change?
<--- Score
100. Which Materials Processing impacts are significant?
<--- Score
101. What are the types and number of measures to use?
<--- Score
102. How do you aggregate measures across priorities?
<--- Score
103. How do you measure efficient delivery of Materials Processing services?
<--- Score
104. What is measured? Why?
<--- Score
105. Are missed Materials Processing opportunities costing your organization money?
<--- Score
106. Which measures and indicators matter?
<--- Score
107. What are the costs and benefits?
<--- Score
108. Are you taking your company in the direction of better and revenue or cheaper and cost?
<--- Score
109. What does losing customers cost your organization?
<--- Score
110. What is the total fixed cost?
<--- Score
111. How will you measure your Materials Processing effectiveness?
<--- Score
112.