products, or the husbandry activities associated with cleaning, could also act as stressors for dogs (Rooney et al. 2009).
1.6.3.6 Sounds
Shelter acoustics generally include husbandry‐oriented noises, people talking at varying decibels, barking, and even loud music. Shelter noise levels are in the area of 85 to 120 db, comparable to a subway, jackhammer, or propeller aircraft (Coppola et al. 2006). Noises, depending on their regularity and acoustic properties, can promote acute or chronic stress. Benefits of the addition of human‐centric noises, such as different types of music, is somewhat equivocal. Heavy metal music significantly increased dog body shaking, whereas classical music was associated with more resting behavior (Wells et al. 2002). At the same time, the effect of the same or inescapable music over extended periods of time has not been studied.
1.6.3.7 Lack of Predictability and Control
Lack of predictability and control over contingencies are known challenges to welfare (Taylor and Mills 2007). Dogs living on the streets or in homes build up expectations and associations in relation to known environments. The imposition of daily cleaning and feeding and walking schedules as well as consistent interactions can offer shelter dogs a sense of predictability. However, excessive monotony is a risk factor for dogs as well. Creating motivations for dogs to perform behaviors for particular rewards could enhance welfare, and positive affective states could be achieved as a result of self‐directed problem solving (McGowan et al. 2014). Identifying potential shelter stressors provides an opportunity to ameliorate them and make them predictable, controllable, or decreased in terms of intensity, frequency, or duration. In shelters, control can be diminished by physical restriction, for example, in terms of space, that limits agency to flee or retreat. As a result, frustration or appetitive behaviors may appear as well as new, possibly undesirable behaviors.
1.7 Conclusions
Dogs have a unique worldview that differs from that of other companion animal species. Although dogs and humans have lived together for thousands of years, dogs maintain their own species‐specific worldview, behaviors, and interests. Dogs have not become more “human‐like” because some now have birthday parties or Instagram accounts. Dogs living on streets will scavenge, while dogs living in homes might be reprimanded for “exploring” the trash—same behavior, interpreted differently due to context. This chapter asks that people regard dogs on their terms, not ours, and pay direct attention to in situ behavior.
Acknowledgments
We thank Natalya Zahn for lending her artistic talents and eye for dogs to this project. Heaps of thanks to Merav Stein (first edition) and Molly Ball (second edition) for taking on the unenviable task of citation compilation and editing.Please visit the companion website for video clips and downloadable resources associated with this chapter.
References
1 Adams, D.R. and Wiekamp, M.D. (1984). The canine vomeronasal organ. J. Anat. 138: 771–787.
2 Albuquerque, N., Guo, K., Wilkinson, A. et al. (2018). Mouth‐licking by dogs as a response to emotional stimuli. Behav. Process. 146: 42–45.
3 Aloff, B. (2005). Canine Body Language: A Photographic Guide Interpreting the Native Language of the Domestic Dog. Wenatchee, WA: Dogwise Publishing.
4 Amaya, V., Paterson, M.B.A., and Phillips, C.J.C. (2020). Effects of olfactory and auditory enrichment on the behaviour of shelter dogs. Animals 10: 581.
5 American Veterinary Society of Animal Behavior. (2008). AVSAB Position Statement on Puppy Socialization. https://avsab.org/wp‐content/uploads/2018/03/Puppy_Socialization_Position_Statement_Download_‐_10‐3‐14.pdf (accessed 7 April 2021).
6 Asher, L., Diesel, G., Summers, J.F. et al. (2009). Inherited defects in pedigree dogs. Part 1: Disorders related to breed standards. Vet. J. 182: 402–411.
7 Asher, L., England, G.C.W., Sommerville, R., and Harvey, N.D. (2020). Teenage dogs? Evidence for adolescent‐phase conflict behaviour and an association between attachment to humans and pubertal timing in the domestic dog. Biol. Lett. 16: 20200097.
8 Bain, M. (2020). Surgical and behavioral relationships with welfare. Front. Vet. Sci. 7: 519
9 Barrera, G., Dzik, V., Cavalli, C. et al. (2018). Effect of intranasal oxytocin administration on human‐directed social behaviors in shelter and pet dogs. Front. Psychol. 9: 2227.
10 Bateson, P. (1979). How do sensitive periods arise and what are they for? Anim. Behav. 27: 470–486.
11 Bateson, P. (2010). Independent inquiry into dog breeding. University of Cambridge. Report.
12 Beerda, B., Schilder, M.B.H., van Hooff, J.A.R.A.M. et al. (1998). Behavioural, saliva cortisol and heart rate responses to different types of stimuli in dogs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 58: 365–381.
13 Bekoff, M. (1979). Ground scratching by male domestic dogs: A composite signal. J. Mammal. 60: 847–848.
14 Bekoff, M. (2001). Observations of scent‐marking and discriminating self from others by a domestic dog (Canis familiaris): Tales of displaced yellow snow. Behav. Process. 55: 75–79.
15 Bennett, P.C. and Perini, E. (2003). Tail docking in dogs: A review of the issues. Aust. Vet. J. 81: 208–218.
16 Bhattacharjee, D., Mandal, S., Shit, P. et al. (2020). Free‐ranging dogs are capable of utilizing complex human pointing cues. Front. Psychol. 10: 2818.
17 Blackwell, E. (2010). Socialization. In: The Encyclopedia of Applied Animal Behaviour & Welfare (eds. D.S. Mills et al.), 567–568. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
18 Boissy, A. (1995). Fear and fearfulness in animals. Q. Rev. Biol. 70: 165–191.
19 Bowlby, J. (1958). The nature of the child's tie to his mother. Int. J. Psychoanal. 39: 350–373.
20 Bradshaw, J.W.S. and Lea, A.M. (1992). Dyadic interactions between domestic dogs. Anthrozoös 5: 245–253.
21 Bradshaw, J.W.S., Rooney, N. (2017). Dog social behavior and communication. In: The Domestic Dog: Its Evolution, Behavior and Interactions with People (ed. J. Serpell), 133–159. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22 Bremhorst, A., Sutter, N.A., Würbel, H. et al. (2019). Differences in facial expressions during positive anticipation and frustration in dogs awaiting a reward. Sci. Rep. 9: 19312.
23 Caeiro, C., Guo, K. and Mills, D. (2017). Dogs and humans respond to emotionally competent stimuli by producing different facial actions. Sci. Rep. 7: 15525.
24 Case, L. (2005). The Dog: Its Behavior, Nutrition, and Health, 2nd ed. Ames, IA: Blackwell.
25 Casey, R.A., Loftus, B., Bolster, C. et al. (2014). Human directed aggression in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris): Occurrence in different contexts and risk factors. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 152: 52–63.
26 Chapagain, D., Range, F., Huber, L. et al. (2018). Cognitive aging in dogs. Gerontology 64: 165–171.
27 Chin, L. (2020). Doggie Language: A Dog Lover's Guide to Understanding Your Best Friend. London: Summersdale Publishers Ltd.
28 Cimarelli, G., Marshall‐Pescini, S., Range, F. et al. (2019). Pet dogs’ relationships vary rather individually than according to partner’s species. Sci. Rep. 9: 3437.
29 Coppinger, R. and Schneider, R. (1995). Evolution of working dogs. In: The Domestic Dog: Its Evolution, Behaviour and Interactions with (eople (ed. J. Serpell), 21–47. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30 Coppola, C.L., Enns, R.M., and Grandin, T. (2006). Noise in the animal shelter environment: Building design and the effects of daily noise exposure. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci.