What are the estimated costs of proposed changes?
<--- Score
34. What do people want to verify?
<--- Score
35. What would be a real cause for concern?
<--- Score
36. How can you reduce the costs of obtaining inputs?
<--- Score
37. What are the uncertainties surrounding estimates of impact?
<--- Score
38. Do you have a flow diagram of what happens?
<--- Score
39. What is your Administrative review quality cost segregation study?
<--- Score
40. Do you have an issue in getting priority?
<--- Score
41. Are you able to realize any cost savings?
<--- Score
42. How do you measure success?
<--- Score
43. How long to keep data and how to manage retention costs?
<--- Score
44. What would it cost to replace your technology?
<--- Score
45. What harm might be caused?
<--- Score
46. What drives O&M cost?
<--- Score
47. Are there any easy-to-implement alternatives to Administrative review? Sometimes other solutions are available that do not require the cost implications of a full-blown project?
<--- Score
48. What are you verifying?
<--- Score
49. When are costs are incurred?
<--- Score
50. How are measurements made?
<--- Score
51. How do you verify and validate the Administrative review data?
<--- Score
52. How do you verify the authenticity of the data and information used?
<--- Score
53. Who pays the cost?
<--- Score
54. What relevant entities could be measured?
<--- Score
55. What causes extra work or rework?
<--- Score
56. What users will be impacted?
<--- Score
57. What do you measure and why?
<--- Score
58. Are there competing Administrative review priorities?
<--- Score
59. What methods are feasible and acceptable to estimate the impact of reforms?
<--- Score
60. Are you aware of what could cause a problem?
<--- Score
61. What is the total cost related to deploying Administrative review, including any consulting or professional services?
<--- Score
62. What potential environmental factors impact the Administrative review effort?
<--- Score
63. What is an unallowable cost?
<--- Score
64. How do you verify performance?
<--- Score
65. What can be used to verify compliance?
<--- Score
66. What causes mismanagement?
<--- Score
67. Are the units of measure consistent?
<--- Score
68. Does management have the right priorities among projects?
<--- Score
69. Is the solution cost-effective?
<--- Score
70. What details are required of the Administrative review cost structure?
<--- Score
71. What are your primary costs, revenues, assets?
<--- Score
72. What disadvantage does this cause for the user?
<--- Score
73. What does a Test Case verify?
<--- Score
74. What causes investor action?
<--- Score
75. What are the types and number of measures to use?
<--- Score
76. How is the value delivered by Administrative review being measured?
<--- Score
77. Are you taking your company in the direction of better and revenue or cheaper and cost?
<--- Score
78. Was a business case (cost/benefit) developed?
<--- Score
79. What are the current costs of the Administrative review process?
<--- Score
80. How do you measure efficient delivery of Administrative review services?
<--- Score
81. What could cause delays in the schedule?
<--- Score
82. How do you control the overall costs of your work processes?
<--- Score
83. What are your key Administrative review organizational performance measures, including key short and longer-term financial measures?
<--- Score
84. Is there an opportunity to verify requirements?
<--- Score
85. Did you tackle the cause or the symptom?
<--- Score
86. Is it possible to estimate the impact of unanticipated complexity such as wrong or failed assumptions, feedback, etcetera on proposed reforms?
<--- Score
87. How is progress measured?
<--- Score
88. How can you measure Administrative review in a systematic way?
<--- Score
89. How will costs be allocated?
<--- Score
90. Who should receive measurement reports?
<--- Score
91. What is measured? Why?
<--- Score
92. How can you reduce costs?
<--- Score
93. How can you measure the performance?
<--- Score
94. How frequently do you track Administrative