for collagen extraction, based on three main extraction processes: extraction of salt‐soluble collagen (SSC), acid‐soluble collagen (ASC), and enzyme‐soluble collagen (ESC). These extraction methods directly affect collagen properties and yield [36], and depend on factors such as fish species and age [37]. It is worth noting that all procedures within collagen extraction are performed at low temperature (∼4 °C) for 24–48 hours. Although an increasing extraction temperature and time can offer a higher collagen yield, it may not be desirable due to collagen degradation [38].
Regarding extraction in NaCl solution (SSC extraction), lower yields are obtained compared with ASC and ESC extractions [39]; hence, this method is not widely utilized and acid and/or enzymatic extractions are preferred. In terms of acidic extractions, the use of acetic acid medium for extraction and isolation of collagen from by‐products such as sabalo skin [26] and sea bass scales [40] has been reported. In addition to acetic acid, collagen can also be extracted using other organic acids, such as citric acid [32], or inorganic acids such as hydrochloric acid [41] and phosphoric acid [42]. However, it must be considered that the solubility of collagen in acidic media is limited owing to many interchain cross‐links, covalent bonds formed via the condensation reaction of aldehydes with lysine and hydroxylysine at the telopeptide region [43]. Moreover, habitat and age of animals or collagen by‐product source affect directly the content of keto–imine bonds and, hence, the solubility in acidic media [44]. In order to improve solubility and achieve higher yield, extraction parameters can be changed, including acid concentration, ratio of acid solution/raw materials, extraction temperature and time; however, these parameters must be controlled in order to avoid collagen degradation [45]. Depending on the degree of collagen aggregation, the extraction process could also include the use of proteolytic enzymes [46–48], which together with an acidic solution might lead to an increase in the yield, by combining biological and chemical pretreatments. Diverse enzymes have been employed, among them, trypsin and pepsin digestive proteases [49] and bacterial collagenases [27]. Indeed, the most commonly employed enzyme is pepsin and, in this sense, the resultant pepsin‐extracted collagen is called pepsin‐soluble collagen (PSC) [50]. This digestive protease can remove non‐collagenous proteins and increase the purity of collagen. Thus, non‐collagenous proteins can be hydrolyzed by pepsin and removed using salt precipitation and dialysis. Additionally, pepsin can also hydrolyze collagen telopeptides, contributing to the treated collagen solubilization in acid media and, thereby increasing the yield of acid‐soluble extraction [36]. Several studies have shown an increase in the acidic extraction yield with the aid of pepsin [40, 51, 52]. It is worth noting that commercial pepsin is commonly obtained from porcine gastric mucosa; however, in order to avoid some religious restrictions a huge range of proteolytic enzymes, including pepsin, can be extracted from fish viscera [34]. Furthermore, the choice of suitable enzymes and physiochemical conditions for the enzymatic reaction, such as solution pH, temperature, hydrolysis time, and enzyme concentration, must be optimized for the maximum activity. In recent years, other techniques have been used to improve SSC, ASC, and ESC extraction methods, among them, ultrasonic treatments and homogenization‐aided methods. Zou et al. [53] worked with ultrasonic power of 200 W having a single frequency of 24 kHz to obtain collagen extracted from calipash of soft‐shelled turtle. On the other hand, Tan and Chang [41] successfully extracted collagen from catfish skin by mixing catfish skins, hydrochloric acid, and pepsins at 7000 rpm for five minutes until homogenization and then the mixture was stirred for one hour at 4 °C. After extraction processes, some final steps must be carried out. Thus, collagen is usually recovered using salt precipitation, centrifugation, dialysis, and freeze‐drying. Generally, collagen solution is precipitated using NaCl. The salt concentrations employed for collagen precipitation can be adjusted to maximize the collagen recovery and removal of impurities. Then, centrifugation (around 10 000–20 000 rpm) is used to collect the precipitated collagen. The resultant precipitate is dissolved in acetic acid prior to dialysis against distilled water. The dialysate is finally freeze‐dried and the obtained collagen powder is stored [43].
All aforementioned methods are generally time‐, energy‐, reactant‐, and cost‐consuming batch type processes. Therefore, alternative methods are emerging, among them, extrusion‐hydro‐extraction (EHE) processes. Extrusion is widely used in the food industry and it offers many advantages, such as ease of operation, continuous production, high yield, and little waste. Using this method, Huang et al. [54] developed a novel EHE process for collagen extraction from tilapia fish scale, obtaining extruded scale samples with two to three times higher protein extraction yield than that of non‐extruded scale samples.
With regard to fish gelatin extraction, this protein is obtained through the hydrolysis of collagen. Many studies in the literature have reported different protocols for the obtainment of fish gelatin. The extraction protocols typically include the use of acid or alkaline chemicals as pretreatments. In this way, two types of gelatins can be differentiated: type A gelatin, derived from collagen by acid pretreatment (most fish gelatins are within this group); and type B gelatin, as a result of an alkaline pretreatment of collagen [55]. After pretreatments, gelatin is extracted using relative high temperature (45–50 °C) [56]. Compared with collagen extraction conditions, gelatin extraction temperatures are higher, since the protein chains need a stronger modification to become gelatin.
2.2.2 Preparation and Characterization of Fish Gelatin Films and Coatings
In order to prepare fish gelatin coatings, solutions can be applied onto food surfaces using different techniques, such as dipping, spraying, brushing, or panning [57], dipping and spraying being the most employed on fish, dairy products, or minimally‐processed fruit and vegetables. Abdelhedi et al. [58] evaluated the quality of fresh fish fillet samples immersed into different gelatin solutions. Indeed, samples dipped into black barred halfbeak (Hemiramphus far) gelatin solution were more efficient than samples coated with commercial bovine gelatin, and the effect was improved by the addition of its hydrolysate.
Considering gelatin has excellent film‐forming capacity, fish gelatin films are often prepared via solution casting for food packaging applications [59]. The process starts with dissolving gelatin along with additives, such as plasticizers or active compounds, in a suitable solvent, usually water or water–alcohol solutions. Heating and/or pH changes alter solution conditions, which affect the final properties of the film. Then, the solution is cast and, finally, solvent evaporation takes place when solutions are subjected to drying processes, leading to film formation [60]. Solution casting is widely used at laboratory scale owing to its simplicity [61, 62]. However, dry methods, such as compression molding [63] and extrusion [64], have also been used [65]. These methods are larger production techniques, faster, and more appropriate for industrial scale production since the pre‐existing technology used in the plastic industry can be used for gelatin film production.
In order to assess the suitability of films for food packaging, their properties must be evaluated. The mechanical behavior of films is an important issue, since films intended for food packaging require both resistance and flexibility to facilitate handling and to avoid breaking during packaging, transport, and storage stages [66]. Thus, plasticizers are commonly added to reduce hydrogen bonding and increase the molecular spacing between protein chains [67]. Due to its small size and hydrophilic nature, glycerol is a compatible plasticizer with fish gelatin and it has been widely used for gelatins [68–70]. However, the incorporation of more hydrophobic additives, such as fatty acids, may increase water resistance of fish gelatin films [71]. Physical, chemical, and enzymatic cross‐linking have also been explored to reduce water sensitivity of gelatin [65]. In particular, the addition of glucose to promote the chemical cross‐linking with amino groups of gelatin, known as Maillard reaction, reduces water solubility and increases water contact angle of fish gelatin films [72]. Furthermore, barrier properties against UV light are improved with Maillard reaction, even if fish gelatin shows high absorption of UV light in the range of 200–300 nm due to the presence of peptide and aromatic amino acid residues [73]. In addition to UV light barrier properties, fish gelatin can provide materials with good oxygen barrier properties, preventing food oxidation and extending food shelf life [74].
In terms of optical properties, film and coating appearance (color, transparency, and gloss) is directly related to consumer acceptability. Films