Pascal Ribéreau-Gayon

Handbook of Enology, Volume 2


Скачать книгу

average number of glucopyranose units per polymer molecule. This mean number indicates that a given CMC, like metatartaric acid, is a polymer with a range of molecular weights.

      The DP determines the viscosity of a CMC. Viscosity increases with molecular weight. It also varies according to the cation: divalent cations (calcium, magnesium, iron, etc.) reduce viscosity. The DP determines the molecular weight, which may vary from 17,000 to 1,500,000 Da.

      For a CMC with a given DP, the higher its DS, the more cation anchor sites it has, and the more effective it is as a protective colloid (Lubbers et al., 1993).

      In the past, CMCs were poorly defined compounds, with relatively heterogeneous DPs. Their viscosity was unreliable, to the point that they could modify the viscosity of a wine. The CMCs currently on the market have much more clearly defined characteristics, and quality control is more effective, resulting in purer products. Minimum purity is 99.5%, with a sodium content between 7 and 8.9%. Viscosity varies from 25,000 to 50,000 mPa at 25°C, depending on the type of CMC selected. These low values cannot therefore alter the viscosity of the finished beverage.

      The production and use of CMCs as a gelatin substitute dates back to the 1940s and 1950s. They are now used in the food and beverage industry (code: E466), at levels up to 10 g/l or 10 g/kg, as well as in cosmetics and pharmaceuticals. The CMC content of alcoholic and nonalcoholic beverages may be as high as 500 mg/l.

Schematic illustration of the structure of a carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) chain. Schematic illustration of formula for the etherification of celluloses (R–[OH]3) by sodium chloroacetate.

      CMCs are also reputed to promote solubilization of proteins and stabilize solutions containing them (Federson and Thorp, 1993). This property is useful in winemaking for the purpose of preventing protein haze. These CMC–protein interactions may be compared with the carbohydrate–protein association in glycoproteins, such as yeast mannoproteins.

Wine treated Dose of CMC used (g/hl) Comments
Red A.O.C. Bordeaux 2 Unfiltered
Red A.O.C. Buzet 4 Filtered prior to treatment
White A.O.C. Bordeaux 4 Fined, treated with CMC, then filtered
White vin de pays (Gers) 4 Fined, treated with CMC, then filtered
White vin de pays (Loire) 4 Fined, treated with CMC, then filtered
Sparkling wine (Gers) 4 Treated prior to second fermentation
Schematic illustration of comparison of the effectiveness of metatartaric acid and carboxymethylcellulose on turbidity due to tartrate crystals.

      The effectiveness of CMC is due to its property of significantly reducing the growth rate of crystals: a dose of 2 mg/l reduces crystal growth by a factor of seven (Gerbaud, 1996). CMC also modifies the morphology of potassium bitartrate crystals.

      In the case of wines intended for a second fermentation, three different CMCs produced a more stable, persistent bead. Only the CMC with the highest molecular weight caused a slight increase in bubble size. A similar inhibition of crystallization has also been observed in Champagne base wines (A. Maujean, personal communication).

      All these positive results, combined with the fact that these CMCs are easy to use, relatively inexpensive, and do not require special investments, led to their authorization for use in winemaking by the OIV in June 2008 within the limit of 10 g/hl or 100 mg/l. Its transposition into European law via EU regulation 606/2009 also authorizes its use in red and rosé wines at the same maximum dose (10 g/hl or 100 mg/l). Tartrate stability in red wines is more difficult to obtain than in white and rosé wines. The effectiveness of the treatment is proportional to the dose of inhibitor used. For wines with medium to high instability, the use of CMC (at 10 g/hl) improves tartrate stability. However, it does not always help obtain total stability after the cold test. Only slightly unstable red wines are stabilized by CMC.