Who should resolve the Technical Reference Model issues?
<--- Score
56. What training and capacity building actions are needed to implement proposed reforms?
<--- Score
57. Consider your own Technical Reference Model project, what types of organizational problems do you think might be causing or affecting your problem, based on the work done so far?
<--- Score
58. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Technical Reference Model delivery, for example is new software needed?
<--- Score
59. Why the need?
<--- Score
60. What are the clients issues and concerns?
<--- Score
61. What problems are you facing and how do you consider Technical Reference Model will circumvent those obstacles?
<--- Score
62. How do you identify the kinds of information that you will need?
<--- Score
63. How do you assess your Technical Reference Model workforce capability and capacity needs, including skills, competencies, and staffing levels?
<--- Score
64. Do you have/need 24-hour access to key personnel?
<--- Score
65. Can management personnel recognize the monetary benefit of Technical Reference Model?
<--- Score
66. Are employees recognized for desired behaviors?
<--- Score
67. What Technical Reference Model problem should be solved?
<--- Score
68. What should be considered when identifying available resources, constraints, and deadlines?
<--- Score
69. Who needs what information?
<--- Score
70. What do employees need in the short term?
<--- Score
71. What is the smallest subset of the problem you can usefully solve?
<--- Score
72. Where is training needed?
<--- Score
73. Which information does the Technical Reference Model business case need to include?
<--- Score
74. What activities does the governance board need to consider?
<--- Score
75. Looking at each person individually – does every one have the qualities which are needed to work in this group?
<--- Score
76. What Technical Reference Model events should you attend?
<--- Score
77. Did you miss any major Technical Reference Model issues?
<--- Score
78. What information do users need?
<--- Score
79. What Technical Reference Model capabilities do you need?
<--- Score
80. How are you going to measure success?
<--- Score
81. Will it solve real problems?
<--- Score
82. How do you take a forward-looking perspective in identifying Technical Reference Model research related to market response and models?
<--- Score
83. Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?
<--- Score
84. What are the minority interests and what amount of minority interests can be recognized?
<--- Score
85. What do you need to start doing?
<--- Score
86. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?
<--- Score
87. What would happen if Technical Reference Model weren’t done?
<--- Score
88. To what extent does each concerned units management team recognize Technical Reference Model as an effective investment?
<--- Score
89. Is the quality assurance team identified?
<--- Score
90. How do you recognize an Technical Reference Model objection?
<--- Score
91. What tools and technologies are needed for a custom Technical Reference Model project?
<--- Score
92. What needs to stay?
<--- Score
93. What situation(s) led to this Technical Reference Model Self Assessment?
<--- Score
94. Are there recognized Technical Reference Model problems?
<--- Score
95. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in Technical Reference Model? In other words, what are the risks, if Technical Reference Model does not deliver successfully?
<--- Score
96. What vendors make products that address the Technical Reference Model needs?
<--- Score
97. Does Technical Reference Model create potential expectations in other areas that need to be recognized and considered?
<--- Score
98. How does it fit into your organizational needs and tasks?
<--- Score
99. What else needs to be measured?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Technical Reference Model Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What are the record-keeping requirements of Technical Reference Model activities?
<--- Score
2. How do you manage unclear Technical Reference Model requirements?
<--- Score
3. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
4. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
5. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders,