<--- Score
40. What drives O&M cost?
<--- Score
41. The approach of traditional Technical Reference Model works for detail complexity but is focused on a systematic approach rather than an understanding of the nature of systems themselves, what approach will permit your organization to deal with the kind of unpredictable emergent behaviors that dynamic complexity can introduce?
<--- Score
42. What would be a real cause for concern?
<--- Score
43. Are there any easy-to-implement alternatives to Technical Reference Model? Sometimes other solutions are available that do not require the cost implications of a full-blown project?
<--- Score
44. What are you verifying?
<--- Score
45. Do you have a flow diagram of what happens?
<--- Score
46. What does a Test Case verify?
<--- Score
47. Do you have any cost Technical Reference Model limitation requirements?
<--- Score
48. How can you measure Technical Reference Model in a systematic way?
<--- Score
49. Where can you go to verify the info?
<--- Score
50. Are supply costs steady or fluctuating?
<--- Score
51. What measurements are being captured?
<--- Score
52. How can you measure the performance?
<--- Score
53. How can a Technical Reference Model test verify your ideas or assumptions?
<--- Score
54. What are the operational costs after Technical Reference Model deployment?
<--- Score
55. What are the costs of delaying Technical Reference Model action?
<--- Score
56. Are missed Technical Reference Model opportunities costing your organization money?
<--- Score
57. Do the benefits outweigh the costs?
<--- Score
58. How can you reduce costs?
<--- Score
59. What could cause you to change course?
<--- Score
60. Has a cost center been established?
<--- Score
61. How to cause the change?
<--- Score
62. What are your primary costs, revenues, assets?
<--- Score
63. Who should receive measurement reports?
<--- Score
64. How do you measure lifecycle phases?
<--- Score
65. How do you measure success?
<--- Score
66. How much does it cost?
<--- Score
67. Are actual costs in line with budgeted costs?
<--- Score
68. What is the Technical Reference Model business impact?
<--- Score
69. Are there measurements based on task performance?
<--- Score
70. What disadvantage does this cause for the user?
<--- Score
71. Who is involved in verifying compliance?
<--- Score
72. How do you stay flexible and focused to recognize larger Technical Reference Model results?
<--- Score
73. How frequently do you track Technical Reference Model measures?
<--- Score
74. What are the estimated costs of proposed changes?
<--- Score
75. How sensitive must the Technical Reference Model strategy be to cost?
<--- Score
76. How are measurements made?
<--- Score
77. What causes investor action?
<--- Score
78. Among the Technical Reference Model product and service cost to be estimated, which is considered hardest to estimate?
<--- Score
79. Do you verify that corrective actions were taken?
<--- Score
80. What harm might be caused?
<--- Score
81. Is there an opportunity to verify requirements?
<--- Score
82. When a disaster occurs, who gets priority?
<--- Score
83. Did you tackle the cause or the symptom?
<--- Score
84. How do you verify if Technical Reference Model is built right?
<--- Score
85. How do you focus on what is right -not who is right?
<--- Score
86. How do you verify the Technical Reference Model requirements quality?
<--- Score
87. What does your operating model cost?
<--- Score
88. What methods are feasible and acceptable to estimate the impact of reforms?
<--- Score
89. Where is it measured?
<--- Score
90. What are the Technical Reference Model investment costs?
<--- Score
91. How do you measure efficient delivery of Technical Reference Model services?
<--- Score
92. How do you verify your resources?
<--- Score
93. When should you bother with diagrams?
<--- Score
94. What are hidden Technical Reference Model quality costs?
<--- Score
95. What can be used to verify compliance?
<--- Score
96. What does verifying compliance entail?
<--- Score
97. How do you aggregate measures across priorities?
<--- Score
98. What measurements are possible, practicable and meaningful?
<--- Score
99. Do you