What was the context?
<--- Score
9. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
10. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
11. What is in scope?
<--- Score
12. How will the Work-integrated learning team and the group measure complete success of Work-integrated learning?
<--- Score
13. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
14. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
15. Have all basic functions of Work-integrated learning been defined?
<--- Score
16. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
17. What are the Work-integrated learning tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
18. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
19. How have you defined all Work-integrated learning requirements first?
<--- Score
20. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
21. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Work-integrated learning goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
22. Is there a critical path to deliver Work-integrated learning results?
<--- Score
23. Who is gathering Work-integrated learning information?
<--- Score
24. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
25. What is the scope of the Work-integrated learning effort?
<--- Score
26. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
27. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
28. Will a Work-integrated learning production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
29. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
30. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
31. What is the definition of Work-integrated learning excellence?
<--- Score
32. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
33. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
34. Is special Work-integrated learning user knowledge required?
<--- Score
35. What Work-integrated learning services do you require?
<--- Score
36. Will team members regularly document their Work-integrated learning work?
<--- Score
37. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
38. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
39. Is there any additional Work-integrated learning definition of success?
<--- Score
40. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
41. How do you hand over Work-integrated learning context?
<--- Score
42. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
43. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
44. What Work-integrated learning requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
45. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
46. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
47. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
48. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
49. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
50. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
51. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
52. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
53. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
54. How do you catch Work-integrated learning definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
55. Who are the Work-integrated learning improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
56. What would be the goal or target for a Work-integrated learning’s improvement team?
<--- Score
57. What is the context?
<--- Score
58. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
59. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
60. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
61. Are the Work-integrated learning requirements complete?
<--- Score
62. How does the Work-integrated learning manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
63. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
64. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
65. How will variation in the actual durations