Gerardus Blokdyk

Work Integrated Learning A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition


Скачать книгу

be dealt with to ensure that the expected Work-integrated learning results are met?

      <--- Score

      66. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      67. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      68. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      69. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Work-integrated learning?

      <--- Score

      70. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      71. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Work-integrated learning changes?

      <--- Score

      72. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      73. Are the Work-integrated learning requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      74. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      75. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Work-integrated learning leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      76. Do you have a Work-integrated learning success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      77. How do you manage changes in Work-integrated learning requirements?

      <--- Score

      78. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      79. Is the scope of Work-integrated learning defined?

      <--- Score

      80. Are improvement team members fully trained on Work-integrated learning?

      <--- Score

      81. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      82. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      83. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      84. Has the Work-integrated learning work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      85. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      86. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      87. Is the Work-integrated learning scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      88. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

      <--- Score

      89. How are consistent Work-integrated learning definitions important?

      <--- Score

      90. What is the scope of Work-integrated learning?

      <--- Score

      91. How can the value of Work-integrated learning be defined?

      <--- Score

      92. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      93. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      94. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

      <--- Score

      95. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      96. Has a Work-integrated learning requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      97. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      98. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      99. How did the Work-integrated learning manager receive input to the development of a Work-integrated learning improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      100. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      101. What are (control) requirements for Work-integrated learning Information?

      <--- Score

      102. What system do you use for gathering Work-integrated learning information?

      <--- Score

      103. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      104. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Work-integrated learning brings?

      <--- Score

      105. Why are you doing Work-integrated learning and what is the scope?

      <--- Score

      106. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      107. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      108. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      109. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      110. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      111. Do you all define Work-integrated learning in the same way?

      <--- Score

      112. Will team members perform Work-integrated learning work when assigned and in a timely fashion?

      <--- Score

      113. What happens if Work-integrated learning’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      114. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      115. Is the Work-integrated learning scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      116. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      117. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      118. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?