Score
59. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?
<--- Score
60. Are controls defined to recognize and contain problems?
<--- Score
61. Do you have/need 24-hour access to key personnel?
<--- Score
62. Who needs budgets?
<--- Score
63. Is the quality assurance team identified?
<--- Score
64. Will it solve real problems?
<--- Score
65. What are the Microsoft Health resources needed?
<--- Score
66. Who else hopes to benefit from it?
<--- Score
67. How do you recognize an objection?
<--- Score
68. What information do users need?
<--- Score
69. Are employees recognized for desired behaviors?
<--- Score
70. What needs to stay?
<--- Score
71. What is the recognized need?
<--- Score
72. Did you miss any major Microsoft Health issues?
<--- Score
73. Are problem definition and motivation clearly presented?
<--- Score
74. Are there any specific expectations or concerns about the Microsoft Health team, Microsoft Health itself?
<--- Score
75. Have you identified your Microsoft Health key performance indicators?
<--- Score
76. Where is training needed?
<--- Score
77. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in Microsoft Health? In other words, what are the risks, if Microsoft Health does not deliver successfully?
<--- Score
78. What creative shifts do you need to take?
<--- Score
79. What training and capacity building actions are needed to implement proposed reforms?
<--- Score
80. What Microsoft Health problem should be solved?
<--- Score
81. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Microsoft Health delivery, for example is new software needed?
<--- Score
82. What activities does the governance board need to consider?
<--- Score
83. What is the Microsoft Health problem definition? What do you need to resolve?
<--- Score
84. What are your needs in relation to Microsoft Health skills, labor, equipment, and markets?
<--- Score
85. To what extent would your organization benefit from being recognized as a award recipient?
<--- Score
86. Are there Microsoft Health problems defined?
<--- Score
87. Is it needed?
<--- Score
88. What would happen if Microsoft Health weren’t done?
<--- Score
89. What does Microsoft Health success mean to the stakeholders?
<--- Score
90. How can auditing be a preventative security measure?
<--- Score
91. Who needs what information?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Microsoft Health Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Who is gathering Microsoft Health information?
<--- Score
2. When is/was the Microsoft Health start date?
<--- Score
3. Is there a critical path to deliver Microsoft Health results?
<--- Score
4. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
5. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
6. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
7. Is the Microsoft Health scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
8. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
9. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Microsoft Health work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
10. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
11. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
12. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
13. How do you gather Microsoft Health requirements?
<--- Score
14. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
15. What Microsoft Health requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
16. Are the Microsoft Health requirements testable?
<--- Score
17. What are the core elements of the Microsoft Health business case?
<--- Score
18. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
19. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified