Группа авторов

Sprachliche Höflichkeit


Скачать книгу

In: Cole, Peter/Morgan, Jerry L. (Hrsg.) Syntax and semantics. Band 3. New York: Academic Press, 41–58.

      Hall, Kira/Bucholtz, Mary (2013). Epilogue: Facing identity. Journal of Politeness Research 9 (1), 123–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/pr-2013-0006

      Haugh, Michael (2013). Im/politeness, social practice and the participation order. Journal of Pragmatics 58, 52–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.003

      Haugh, Michael (2015). Im/politeness implicatures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

      Haugh, Michael/Kádár, Dániel Z./Mills, Sara (2013). Interpersonal pragmatics: Issues and debates. Journal of Pragmatics 58, 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.09.009

      Kádár, Dániel Z./Haugh, Michael (2013). Understanding politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

      Lakoff, Robin T. (1973). The logic of politeness, or minding your p’s and q’s. Chicago Linguistics Society 9, 292–305.

      Langlotz, Andreas (2010). Social cognition. In: Locher, MiriamA./Graham, Sage L. (Hrsg.) Interpersonal pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 167–202.

      Langlotz, Andreas (2015). Creating social orientation through language: A socio-cognitive theory of situated social meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

      Langlotz, Andreas/Locher, Miriam A. (2012). Ways of communicating emotional stance in online disagreements. Journal of Pragmatics 44:12, 1591–1606. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.04.002

      Langlotz, Andreas/Locher, Miriam A. (2013). The role of emotions in relational work. Journal of Pragmatics 58, 87–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.014

      Langlotz, Andreas/Locher, Miriam A. (2017). (Im)politeness and emotion. In: Culpeper, Jonathan/Kádár, Dániel Z. (Hrsg.), Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness. London: Palgrave, 287–322.

      Leech, Geoffrey N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. New York: Longman.

      Leech, Geoffrey N. (2014). The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

      Locher, Miriam A. (2006). Advice online. Advice-giving in an American internet health column. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

      Locher, Miriam A. (2008). Relational work, politeness and identity construction. In: Antos, Gerd/Ventola, Eija/Weber, Tilo (Hrsg.) Handbook of linguistics 2: Interpersonal communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 509–540.

      Locher, Miriam A. (2012). Politeness research from past to future, with a special focus on the discursive approach. In: Fernández Amaya, Lucia/Hernández López, Maria/Gómez Morón, Reyes/Padilla Cruz, Manuel/Mejías Borrero, Manuel/Relinque Barranca, Mariana (Hrsg.) New perspectives on (im)politeness and interpersonal communication. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars, 36–60.

      Locher, Miriam A. (2014). The relational aspect of language: Avenues of research. In: Mergenthal, Silvia/Nischik, Reingard M. (Hrsg.) Anglistentag 2013 Konstanz. Proceedings. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, 309–322. http://www.wvttrier.de/top/Proceedings_2013_WVT.pdf

      Locher, Miriam A./Graham, Sage L. (2010). Introduction to interpersonal pragmatics. In: Locher, Miriam A./Graham, Sage L. (Hrsg.) Interpersonal pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, 1–13.

      Locher, Miriam A./Langlotz, Andreas (2008). Relational work: At the intersection of cognition, interaction and emotion. Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquée (VALS-ASLA) 88, 165–191. http://doc.rero.ch/record/11876/files/bulletin_vals_asla_2008_088.pdf

      Locher, Miriam A./Schnurr, Stephanie (2017). (Im)politeness in health settings. In: Culpeper, Jonathan/Haugh, Michael/Kádár, Dániel Z. (Hrsg.), Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness. London: Palgrave, 287–322.

      Locher, Miriam A./Watts, Richard J. (2005). Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research 1:1, 9–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9

      Locher, Miriam A./Watts, Richard J. (2008). Relational work and impoliteness: Negotiating norms of linguistic behaviour. In: Bousfield, Derek/Locher, Miriam A. (Hrsg.) Impoliteness in Language. Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 77–99.

      Miller, Elizabeth R. (2013). Positioning selves, doing relational work and constructing identities in interview talk. Journal of Politeness Research 9:1, 75–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/pr-2013-0004

      Silverman, David/Peräkylä, Anssi (1990). AIDS counselling: The interactional organisation of talk about ’delicate’ issues. Sociology of Health & Illness 12:3, 293–318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347251

      Spencer-Oatey, Helen (2007). Theories of identity and the analysis of face. Journal of Pragmatics 39:4, 639–656. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.004

      Spencer-Oatey, Helen (2011). Conceptualising ’the relational’ in pragmatics: Insights from metapragmatic emotion and (im)politeness comments. Journal of Pragmatics 43:14, 3565–3578. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.08.009

      Über Höflichkeit

      Hans Jürgen Heringer

      Generally we speak about politeness as an activity that needs some kind of special effort. In the use of language and in communication that means that one has to do something more than required by the default case and the communication maxims. One word more, something stilistically elevated, a difficult or more complex form (e.g. subjunctive) an indirect speech act.

      For a strucutralist linguist it is also possible to ask: from what do polite speakers distinguish with their polite expressions? In terms of Saussure: To what are polite expressions in opposition? What do they live upon?

      Here we arrive immediately on the dark side of politeness. I don’t dare to pass there. Why not? (see my App „Wildes Deutsch“).

      Wer sich mit Höflichkeit befasst, von dem wird vielleicht zu Anfang eine Antwort auf die Frage erwartet: Was ist Höflichkeit?

      Dieser Art Fragen sind nun allerdings in mehrerlei Sinn naiv: Höflichkeit ist nicht irgendein vorgegebener Gegenstand, den man nach aristotelischem Muster definieren könnte. Schon bei der Frage nach dem genus proximum zeigt sich eine Vielfalt – und eine Tendenz.

       Duden Universalwörterbuch

      höflich

      in seinem Verhalten anderen Menschen gegenüber aufmerksam u. rücksichtsvoll, so, wie es die Umgangsformen gebieten

       PONS Schulwörterbuch

      höflich

      den Regeln des Anstands entsprechend

      ein höflicher Mensch

      höfliches Verhalten

       jemanden höflich grüßen/ um etwas höflich bitten

      Höflichkeit (Meibauer 2008, 197)

      Ausdruck